Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00995

Introduced
3/8/17  
Introduced
3/8/17  
Refer
3/8/17  
Refer
3/8/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Refer
4/3/17  
Refer
4/3/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Reduction Of Certain Land-based Marine And Freshwater Debris.

Impact

The bill's passage will lead to more stringent regulations regarding waste management in state parks and shorelines, effectively altering the current state laws on littering. Specifically, it gives the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection the authority to enforce smoking bans on state beaches and fine violators. This new framework is expected to enhance public health and environmental quality by lessening the amount of debris entering marine ecosystems. Additionally, it may influence fishing activities by reinforcing regulations prohibiting littering and fortifying fines for discarded fishing gear.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 995 addresses the issue of land-based marine and freshwater debris, introducing regulations aimed at reducing such waste in environmental habitats, particularly along state park beaches. The bill prohibits smoking at these locations, asserting a direct measure to minimize litter from cigarette products, which is a significant contributor to environmental pollution. Furthermore, the bill mandates public education programs led by the Recycle CT Foundation, focusing on raising awareness about marine debris and encouraging responsible disposal behavior among the public.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB00995 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates who view it as a necessary step toward preserving public spaces and marine environments. The introduction of preventative measures against smoking and efforts towards educating the community have been positively received. However, there may be contention regarding the enforcement of smoking bans and potential restrictions that could affect recreational activities for visitors at state parks.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely stem from the balance between public freedom and environmental protection. Critics could argue that such regulations may infringe on personal liberties by prohibiting smoking in public areas, which can be perceived as a governmental overreach. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the effectiveness of educational initiatives versus stricter punitive measures to combat marine debris, focusing on whether public awareness campaigns can drive significant behavioral changes compared to enforced regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.