Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01007

Introduced
3/9/17  
Introduced
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/12/17  
Report Pass
4/12/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Report Pass
5/9/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Data Relating To Special Education Expenditures And The Intentional Underbudgeting Of Special Education.

Impact

The implementation of SB01007 is expected to enforce stricter scrutiny on the budgeting decisions made by local educational agencies. For the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2018, the bill stipulates that if a school district is found to have intentionally budgeted insufficient funds for special education and relies on town budgets to cover the shortfall, towns will not be liable for these additional expenses. This provision is designed to prevent local boards from underfunding special education and shifting financial responsibility to municipalities.

Summary

SB01007, entitled 'An Act Concerning the Reporting of Data Relating to Special Education Expenditures and the Intentional Underbudgeting of Special Education', seeks to improve transparency and accountability in the budgeting and expenditure processes for special education at the local level. The bill mandates the Department of Education to prepare annual reports on special education spending by local and regional boards of education. These reports will provide a detailed breakdown of student populations requiring special education services, categorized by the per pupil education costs of each school district, with the aim of highlighting funding disparities and budgetary practices across districts.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB01007 appears to be cautiously supportive, particularly among educational advocates who argue that greater accountability is essential for ensuring that students requiring special educational services receive the adequate funding they need. However, there are concerns regarding the capacity of local boards to respond effectively to the reporting requirements and whether they will receive the necessary state support to fulfill their obligations under the new law.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions surrounding this bill included concerns over the feasibility of accurately reporting the required data and the implications of potential penalties for local boards that fail to meet the new stipulations. Detractors expressed that the bill might inadvertently penalize school districts that genuinely struggle with budgeting due to external factors, rather than intentional mismanagement. Additionally, questions arose about how the bill would affect collaboration between school districts and local governments in future funding negotiations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

CA AB2447

California State University: fiscal transparency: internet website.

AZ HB2364

Lobbyists; gift ban exemption

AZ HB2089

Community colleges; expenditure limitation

CA AB1052

The Financial Information System for California (FISCal).

CA AB62

State government: FI$Cal: transparency.

CA SB468

Taxation: tax expenditures: California Tax Expenditure Review Board.

CA SB768

Transportation projects: comprehensive development lease agreements.