Connecticut Senate Bill SB01030

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/17
• Refer: 3/14/17
• Report Pass: 3/24/17
• Refer: 4/7/17
• Report Pass: 4/13/17
• Engrossed: 5/17/17
• Report Pass: 5/19/17
• Chaptered: 6/9/17
• Enrolled: 6/16/17
• Passed: 6/30/17

Caption

An Act Concerning Statutory References To The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee.

Impact

The changes instituted by SB 1030 are expected to bolster statutory compliance and auditing practices within quasi-public agencies. By mandating biennial compliance audits, the bill aims to ensure these agencies adhere to regulations regarding affirmative action and personnel practices, thus promoting transparency in financial dealings. The Auditors of Public Accounts are empowered to conduct more thorough reviews of agency activities and report findings directly to the Governor. This shift seeks to enhance the reliability of financial reports and accountability standards, offering the potential for better management of public funds and resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 1030, known as An Act Concerning Statutory References To The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee, focuses on enhancing the accountability and oversight of quasi-public agencies in Connecticut. The bill proposes amendments to several sections of the general statutes, particularly concerning reporting and auditing requirements applicable to these agencies. A critical aspect of the legislation is the repeal of certain references to the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee, which streamlines the reporting process directly to the Auditors of Public Accounts, thereby aiming for improved efficiency in the auditing and oversight of agency operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1030 is largely supportive among legislative members who advocate for more stringent oversight of public funds administered by quasi-public agencies. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance accountability and public trust in government institutions. Conversely, there are concerns from critics who question whether eliminating the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee’s involvement might dilute legislative scrutiny, potentially hindering oversight mechanisms intended to protect the public interest.

Contention

One of the main points of contention in discussions surrounding SB 1030 relates to the degree of oversight and scrutiny over quasi-public agencies. Supporters of the bill argue that direct reporting to the Auditors of Public Accounts will simplify compliance and enhance operational efficiency. However, opponents express fears that removing the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee from the auditing process could lead to decreased legislative oversight, enabling agencies to operate with less transparency. Such concerns highlight the ongoing tension between the need for efficient governmental operations and the imperative for robust public accountability.