Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00011

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/17
• Refer: 1/17/17
• Refer: 3/9/17

Caption

Resolution Recognizing The Current Electoral College System As The Best Way To Elect The President Of The United States.

Impact

If passed, SJ00011 would not change existing laws regarding electoral processes but would reaffirm the state's support for the Electoral College system. This resolution stands in opposition to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which seeks to allocate electors based on the national popular vote, thereby undermining state influence in the electoral process. Supporters of the resolution argue that this system ensures presidential candidates must campaign across a variety of states and regions, contributing to a more attentive and representative electoral system.

Summary

SJ00011 is a Senate Joint Resolution that recognizes the current Electoral College system as the optimal method for electing the President of the United States. The resolution asserts that the Founding Fathers deliberately chose this system over a national popular vote to ensure representation across diverse regions and protect the interests of smaller states. By endorsing the Electoral College, the resolution emphasizes its role in maintaining a balance between urban and rural interests in presidential campaigns.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJ00011 is largely supportive among those who value the original structure established by the Founding Fathers. Proponents argue that the Electoral College protects the voices of smaller states and prevents a concentration of power in populous urban areas. However, there remains a significant counter-narrative from those who advocate for a national popular vote, emphasizing that such a system would lead to greater democratic representation and mitigate the risk of disenfranchisement among voters in less populous states.

Contention

There are notable points of contention within the discussions around SJ00011, particularly concerning the legality and moral implications of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Critics of the resolution suggest that maintaining the Electoral College perpetuates inequalities in voter influence and can result in presidents being elected without securing a majority of the popular vote. Proponents counter that the current system effectively balances power across states and ensures that all regions are represented in presidential elections, thus preserving the integrity of the federal system.