Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00017

Introduced
1/4/17  
Refer
1/4/17  
Report Pass
1/13/17  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Glenn A. Woods Of Middletown To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Votes

The resolution received unanimous support during the House Roll Call Vote 20, which fell under the consent calendar. This aspect indicates a streamlined process for approval, suggesting that there was a broad agreement about the nomination and potentially reflecting the confidence in Judge Woods' ability to perform the duties of a Superior Court judge.

Impact

By confirming Judge Woods, the resolution allows for the continued functioning of the Superior Court in the state, which handles a variety of serious criminal cases, civil actions, and appeals from lower courts. This confirmation is significant in maintaining judicial continuity and ensuring that the court has sufficient leadership and judicial experience. The appointment comes at a time when judicial appointments are major points of discussion, reflecting the need for a competent judiciary that adheres to the rule of law.

Summary

SJ00017 is a resolution that confirms the nomination of Glenn A. Woods of Middletown as a Judge of the Superior Court, serving a term of eight years starting February 25, 2017. This resolution was introduced in the January session of 2017 and refers to a recommendation made by the Governor. The resolution outlines the approval of this nomination by the General Assembly, emphasizing the legislative body's role in the confirmation process for judicial appointments in the state.

Contention

There may be different opinions regarding the nomination process itself, including discussions around the qualifications of Judge Woods for the role. The resolution underscores the process by which judicial nominations are handled and confirmed in the state legislature. Although the vote was heavily in favor of the confirmation, with 140 affirmative votes and none against, discussions in legislative settings often highlight differing philosophies about what makes an ideal judge, potentially raising questions about diversity, life experience, and legal philosophy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.