Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05291

Introduced
2/28/18  
Refer
2/28/18  
Refer
2/28/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Engrossed
4/30/18  
Engrossed
4/30/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Chaptered
5/23/18  
Chaptered
5/23/18  
Enrolled
5/25/18  
Enrolled
5/25/18  
Passed
6/6/18  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Study On Access To Information Regarding The Safety Of Sports Helmets.

Impact

The bill mandates that the newly formed working group will not only create performance standards but also determine how safety ratings will be presented to the public. This transparency is intended to empower consumers to make informed decisions when selecting protective headgear for young athletes. If effective, it can potentially lead to a reduction in head injuries associated with youth sports, providing a public health benefit and shifting industry standards toward better protective equipment.

Summary

House Bill 05291, also known as 'An Act Concerning A Study On Access To Information Regarding The Safety Of Sports Helmets,' aims to improve the safety of youth athletic protective headgear through the establishment of a working group led by the Department of Public Health. This group is tasked with developing a safety rating system to evaluate the effectiveness of various models of youth sports helmets in preventing head injuries. Lawmakers recognize the increasing concern over head injuries in youth sports, prompting the need for a formal assessment of the helmets currently in use.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05291 has generally been positive, with broad support among legislators who see the need to address safety in youth athletics. Stakeholders involved in children's health and sports safety are optimistic that this initiative will lead to better protection for young athletes. Concerns have been expressed regarding the potential costs and economic impact on helmet manufacturers. However, the consensus favors prioritizing safety over economic considerations, recognizing the long-term benefits of reducing head injury risks.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the composition of the working group and the balance of interests represented. Critics may raise concerns about potential biases, particularly if helmet manufacturers have significant influence within the group. Additionally, discussions may arise over the adequacy of proposed performance standards and the effectiveness of the public disclosure system in genuinely guiding consumer choices. Overall, while the bill addresses a critical health issue, potential conflicts of interest and the feasibility of its implementation will require careful consideration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.