Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05328

Introduced
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Report Pass
3/15/18  
Report Pass
3/15/18  
Refer
3/23/18  
Report Pass
3/29/18  
Report Pass
3/29/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Admissibility Of Admissions, Confessions And Statements By Children Under The Age Of Eighteen.

Impact

The bill is expected to have significant implications for state laws related to juvenile justice. By making the admissibility of a child’s admissions contingent upon the presence of a parent or guardian, it strengthens protections for minors, potentially reducing the number of legal confessions obtained without proper legal support. This reform represents a shift towards more child-centered justice practices, acknowledging the developmental differences between children and adults, and the increased vulnerability of minors in police interactions.

Summary

House Bill 05328, titled 'An Act Concerning The Admissibility Of Admissions, Confessions And Statements By Children Under The Age Of Eighteen,' addresses the conditions under which statements made by minors can be used in legal proceedings. The bill stipulates that statements made by children under eighteen to police or Juvenile Court officials are often inadmissible unless the child is accompanied by a parent or guardian, and both are informed of the child's rights regarding legal counsel and self-incrimination. This measure aims to protect the rights of minors in the legal system, ensuring that they have appropriate adult support during potentially incriminating procedures.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 05328 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for children's rights and juvenile justice reform. Supporters praise the bill as a necessary step in ensuring fair treatment of minors within the legal system. However, there may be a contrarian sentiment from some law enforcement officials who might argue that these changes could impede investigations and delay justice. Thus, while the protection of children is broadly supported, the bill has elicited varying opinions on how best to balance these protections with effective law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's potential impact on law enforcement procedures and the definition of reasonable efforts to involve parents or guardians in questioning minors. Critics from law enforcement may express concerns that requiring parental presence for admissions could complicate or hinder criminal investigations, especially in urgent circumstances. Additionally, there may be debates about the specific provisions related to providing legal counsel and the implications of such rights on the efficacy of the juvenile justice system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2051

Candidate’s statement.

CA AB2679

Fictitious business names: statements: publication.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB750

Crimes: perjury.