Connecticut House Bill HB05345

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/18
• Refer: 3/1/18
• Report Pass: 3/20/18
• Refer: 3/28/18
• Report Pass: 4/4/18
• Report Pass: 4/24/18

Caption

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Initiate A Docket To Study The Replacement Of Lead Service Lines.

Impact

The legislation aims to enhance public health safety by ensuring that contaminated service lines are identified and replaced. Lead exposure is a significant public health risk, especially for vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women. By requiring a systematic approach to study and replace lead service lines, the bill seeks to mitigate health risks and improve overall water quality across the state. It also aims to provide a structured framework for water companies to develop replacement plans, which could lead to long-term infrastructure improvements.

Summary

House Bill 05345 mandates the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) to initiate a docket focused on the study and replacement of lead service lines in the state. This bill aims to address public health concerns associated with lead exposure through water systems, particularly for customers whose service lines are affected. The authority is tasked to evaluate the current state of lead service lines, develop replacement plans, and assess associated costs benefiting both the utility providers and the customers directly impacted by such improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 05345 is generally supportive among public health advocates and environmental groups, emphasizing the need for urgent action to replace lead service lines. However, there is also caution about potential costs associated with the replacement plans, which may burden water companies and, consequently, ratepayers. Legislative discussions have reflected a consensus on the importance of the issue but highlighted the necessity of careful consideration of implementation costs and funding mechanisms to ensure a smooth transition.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may include concerns over funding for the replacement initiatives and the potential impact on water rates for customers. Stakeholders might debate the extent of the authority's recommendations regarding cost liabilities—whether water companies should absorb these costs or pass them on to consumers. The legislative process will likely involve negotiations to balance public health interests with economic feasibility and the financial readiness of service providers.