Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05563

Introduced
3/19/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Engrossed
5/2/18  
Engrossed
5/2/18  
Report Pass
5/3/18  
Report Pass
5/3/18  
Chaptered
5/24/18  
Chaptered
5/24/18  
Enrolled
5/29/18  
Enrolled
5/29/18  

Caption

An Act Concerning Robo Calls And Spoofing.

Impact

The enactment of HB 5563 would revise existing statutes that govern telecommunication practices, specifically targeting the operation of robocalls – a prevalent nuisance for many residents. It updates the regulations to prevent the use of devices that transmit unsolicited messages and introduces penalties including hefty fines for violators. This legislative measure is a part of broader efforts to modernize state laws in line with consumer protection needs against evolving telemarketing tactics.

Summary

House Bill 5563, known as the Act Concerning Robocalls and Spoofing, aims to regulate the use of unsolicited recorded telephone messages for commercial purposes. The bill prohibits the transmission of such messages to consumers, especially those that continue after the call is disconnected by the recipient. The intention is to protect citizens from unwanted telemarketing calls and to enhance their privacy in communications. Violation of this law can result in significant fines, thus strengthening consumer protection against persistent unwanted calls.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5563 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups who view it as a necessary step toward protecting citizens from intrusive marketing practices. Legislators advocating for the bill emphasize its importance in enhancing privacy and safeguarding residents from deceptive telemarketing tactics. There seems to be broad agreement on the necessity of such regulations, given the growing concerns over consumer privacy in a digital age.

Contention

While support for HB 5563 is pronounced, there are discussions around potential contention regarding its implementation and enforcement. Critics may argue about the feasibility of monitoring robocall practices effectively and the balance between regulation and legitimate business operations. Additionally, concerns about possible overreach in terms of restricting telecommunication practices by legitimate businesses may arise, although these concerns are relatively minor compared to the overall support expressed for the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05140

An Act Concerning Earned Wage Access.

CT HB05422

An Act Concerning Hate And Bias Crimes.

CT SB00308

An Act Concerning Wheelchair Repair Requirements.

CT HB05477

An Act Concerning Penalties For Blight Upon Real Property, Municipal Agreements To Fix Assessments And A Personal Property Tax Exemption.

CT HB05403

An Act Concerning Military Protection Orders And Other Interpersonal Violence Protections.

CT SB00358

An Act Concerning Telephone Communications By Persons Who Are Incarcerated.

CT HB05257

An Act Concerning Liability For Damage To Person Or Property Caused By A Dog.

CT SB00362

An Act Concerning Fines For Certain Disciplinary Actions In Correctional Facilities And The Deposit Of Such Fines Into A Fund For The Benefit Of All Persons Who Are Incarcerated.

CT HB05423

An Act Concerning Fertility Fraud.

CT HB05297

An Act Concerning The Decriminalization Of Possession Of Small Amounts Of Psilocybin.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.