Connecticut House Bill HR00009

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/11/18
• Refer: 4/12/18
• Refer: 4/23/18
• Report Pass: 4/25/18

Caption

Resolution Proposing Approval Of A Collective Bargaining Agreement Between The University Of Connecticut Board Of Trustees And The Graduate Employee Union Local 6950- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (geu-uaw).

Impact

The passage of HR00009 impacts state laws by affirming the negotiated terms between the university and the union, potentially setting a precedent for similar agreements in other state institutions. The resolution underscores the importance of collective bargaining rights for public employees and reflects an institutional commitment to maintain equitable employment practices within the state educational system. By formally approving this agreement, the state reinforces the legal framework around labor negotiations and employee rights, which may affect future contracts and bargaining power for graduate employees.

Summary

HR00009 is a resolution proposing the approval of a collective bargaining agreement between the University of Connecticut Board of Trustees and the Graduate Employee Union Local 6950 of the United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (GEU-UAW). This agreement is set to be effective from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022, and it is a significant step in formalizing the terms of employment for graduate employees at the university, outlining their rights and benefits during this period. The resolution was discussed and ultimately approved by the House assembly in April 2018, with a slight margin in the vote count.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR00009 has been largely supportive, with many legislators recognizing the importance of labor rights for graduate employees. Advocates for the agreement view it as a necessary measure to ensure fair compensation and working conditions for graduate students who play a crucial role in the academic ecosystem. However, there may be discussions regarding funding implications and overall impacts on the university’s budget, which some stakeholders expressed concerns about. The approval vote demonstrates a majority consensus in favor of supporting labor initiatives within the state's educational institutions.

Contention

While HR00009 received approval, some contention arose during discussions regarding the financial implications of the agreement. Legislators were particularly concerned about how the terms of the collective bargaining agreement would be funded and the long-term effects on the university’s financial health. Critics of the resolution might argue that such agreements could limit the flexibility of university administrators to manage budgets effectively. Nevertheless, supporters contend that investing in the welfare of graduate employees ultimately enhances the institution's reputation and effectiveness.