Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00246

Introduced
2/27/18  
Introduced
2/27/18  
Refer
2/27/18  
Refer
2/27/18  
Report Pass
3/16/18  
Report Pass
3/16/18  
Refer
3/26/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Engrossed
5/1/18  
Engrossed
5/1/18  
Report Pass
5/3/18  
Report Pass
5/3/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Enrolled
5/22/18  
Passed
6/1/18  

Caption

An Act Limiting Auto Refills Of Prescription Drugs Covered Under The Medicaid Program And Requiring The Commissioner Of Social Services To Provide Chip Data To The Health Information Technology Officer.

Impact

The legislation alters existing regulations concerning the Medicaid program, specifically addressing the process related to auto-refills of prescription drugs. By implementing a requirement for explicit consent before refilling prescriptions, the bill seeks to guard against over-medication and improve patient engagement in their healthcare decisions. Furthermore, it requires the Commissioner to recommend which drugs should fall under this prohibition, ensuring that recommendations are informed by public input through required hearings. This collaborative process aims to involve various stakeholders in determining best practices for prescription management.

Summary

SB00246 aims to limit the automatic refilling of prescription drugs covered under the Medicaid program. The bill allows the Commissioner of Social Services to prohibit pharmacies from automatically refilling certain medications unless there is an explicit request for a refill from the patient or their representative. This regulatory change is intended to enhance accuracy in medication dispensing and to ensure that patients have more control over their prescriptions, potentially reducing unnecessary medication loads and costs associated with automatic refills, which may not be needed by all recipients.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding SB00246 appeared to be cautiously optimistic. Advocates of the bill emphasized its potential to empower patients, giving them more agency over their health and medication use. However, some concerns were raised about the implications for pharmacists and patients accustomed to automatic refills, highlighting the need for clear communication and education on the new requirements. Supporters argue that improved patient control could lead to better healthcare outcomes, while critics worry about the transitional impacts for vulnerable populations who may struggle with the new consent protocols.

Contention

Despite the positive intentions behind SB00246, the bill has faced scrutiny regarding its implementation. Notable points of contention include the concerns over access to necessary medications for patients who may forget to request refills, particularly among older adults or those with disabilities. Additionally, the requirement for public hearings on drug classifications could lead to delays in enacting the new restrictions and might complicate the regulatory environment for pharmacies. The balance between regulating prescriptions for patient safety and ensuring access to medication remains a central topic of debate among legislators and healthcare providers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB6

Local ballot measures: statement of the measure.

CT HB06496

An Act Concerning Test Bed Technologies.

CT HB05444

An Act Establishing A Test Bed Technologies Program.

CT HB07018

An Act Establishing A Test Bed Technologies Program.

CA SB66

California Council on the Future of Transportation: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.

CT HB06927

An Act Requiring The Study Of Energy Sources.

CA SB59

California Transportation Commission: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.

CA AB1296

Bar pilots: regulation of vessels.