Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00381

Introduced
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  

Caption

An Act Concerning Disclosure Of Certain Third-party Administrator Fees.

Impact

The proposed legislation would have significant implications for state healthcare laws by establishing a statutory requirement for contracting health organizations to disclose specific fee information. This aligns with broader trends in the healthcare industry towards greater transparency and accountability for healthcare costs. By ensuring that providers are informed of mandatory fee structures and policies, the bill may improve the negotiation dynamics between providers and health organizations, potentially leading to reduced surprise billing and greater financial predictability for providers.

Summary

Senate Bill 381, titled 'An Act Concerning Disclosure Of Certain Third-party Administrator Fees,' aims to enhance transparency in healthcare by requiring contracting health organizations to provide detailed information about fees to providers. This bill specifically mandates that managed care organizations and preferred provider networks give access to fee schedules and policies regarding payments in a digital format. Given that many healthcare practitioners operate under fee-for-service contracts, the legislation seeks to ensure that providers have clarity on the costs associated with their services, thus facilitating informed decision-making in their practice.

Contention

Although the bill holds promise for enhancing transparency, it may face challenges from various stakeholders. Opponents might argue that requiring detailed fee disclosures could lead to increased administrative burdens on health organizations or could stifle competitive pricing dynamics across different healthcare providers. Additionally, concerns might arise regarding the confidentiality of proprietary fee information, which could result in resistance from some health organizations worried about disclosing competitive data. Balancing transparency with the protection of business interests will be crucial as debates around this bill continue.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1422

Acquisition of goods and services: alternative contracting procedures: installation of carpet, resilient flooring, synthetic turf, and lighting fixtures: pilot.

CA AB2249

Public contracts: local agencies: alternative procedure.

CA AB1424

University of California: Best Value Construction Contracting Program.

CA SB1505

State contracts: procurement processes.

CA AB2996

Department of Transportation: Job order contracting.

CA AB639

Department of General Services: contracts: electronic submission

CA AB792

Department of Technology: negotiation process: report.

CA SB1366

Department of General Services: job order contracting procurement procedure: pilot.