Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00426

Introduced
3/7/18  
Introduced
3/7/18  
Refer
3/7/18  
Refer
3/7/18  
Report Pass
3/22/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Engrossed
5/3/18  
Engrossed
5/3/18  
Report Pass
5/5/18  
Report Pass
5/5/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Enrolled
5/22/18  
Enrolled
5/22/18  
Passed
6/4/18  

Caption

An Act Concerning Abandoned Fishing Gear In Long Island Sound.

Impact

The enactment of SB 426 is expected to significantly impact state laws regarding aquatic conservation efforts and the management of derelict fishing gear. By establishing procedures for the seizure and disposal of abandoned gear, the bill seeks to promote a cleaner environment in Long Island Sound, thereby supporting local ecosystems. The procedural changes will also clarify the responsibilities of conservation officers and enhance the state's resource management capabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 426, known as An Act Concerning Abandoned Fishing Gear in Long Island Sound, addresses the issue of abandoned or derelict fishing gear in Connecticut waters. The bill empowers conservation officers to seize and take possession of any fishing gear that is abandoned, discarded, or thrown away. It aims to enhance the state's ability to manage and protect marine ecosystems by allowing for the forfeiture and appropriate disposal of such gear if unclaimed after one year. This legislative change is intended to tackle pollution and risks to marine life posed by neglected fishing equipment.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be positive among environmental advocates and conservation groups, who see it as a necessary step towards protecting marine habitats. Lawmakers emphasized the importance of addressing the dangers posed by abandoned gear, which can endanger aquatic life and contribute to environmental degradation. The unanimous vote in favor of the bill indicates bipartisan support, highlighting a shared commitment to environmental protection.

Contention

Despite its strong support, the bill does raise questions about the implementation of the seizure process and the potential burdens placed on conservation officers. Concerns have been voiced regarding the capacity of the state's conservation resources to handle the increased responsibilities effectively. Additionally, there may be discussions about the balance between enforcement and the rights of local fishers in dealing with equipment that may be mistakenly identified as abandoned.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.