Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00054

Introduced
4/16/18  
Introduced
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Lisa Grasso Egan, Esquire, Of New Haven To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Impact

The confirmation of Lisa Grasso Egan as a Superior Court judge is significant for the state's judicial landscape, as it contributes to the composition of the judicial system which directly impacts how laws are interpreted and enforced. Egan's appointment can bring about new perspectives in legal interpretations and decision-making processes within the court system, which could affect various public policies and legal outcomes in the jurisdiction she serves. Additionally, the resolution points to a commitment among lawmakers to participate in the checks and balances regarding judicial appointments.

Summary

SJ00054 is a Senate Joint Resolution that officially confirms the nomination of Lisa Grasso Egan to serve as a Judge of the Superior Court. The resolution follows the standard legislative procedure for judicial nominations, indicating the importance of the judiciary in maintaining the rule of law and ensuring justice within the state. The nominated candidate is expected to fulfill a term of eight years upon confirmation by both Houses of the General Assembly. This resolution reflects the executive branch's role in appointing judges, while also showcasing the legislative body's confirming authority over these appointments.

Contention

While the voting records indicate a majority support for the resolution with 75 in favor and 66 against during the roll call vote, the opposition could signify underlying contentions regarding judicial appointments in general. Although specific points of contention are not deeply elaborated in the provided documents, any dissent usually arises from concerns about the nominee's qualifications, judicial philosophy, or the implications of their appointment on particular legal issues. Such discussions are a part of the critical dialogue surrounding judicial nominations, reflecting diverse perspectives on the judiciary's role.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.