Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05004

Introduced
1/9/19  
Refer
1/9/19  
Refer
2/27/19  
Refer
2/27/19  
Report Pass
3/14/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Report Pass
5/7/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Report Pass
5/10/19  
Chaptered
5/20/19  
Chaptered
5/20/19  
Enrolled
5/22/19  
Enrolled
5/22/19  
Passed
5/28/19  

Caption

An Act Increasing The Minimum Fair Wage.

Impact

The implementation of HB 5004 is expected to significantly impact state labor laws, particularly those concerning employee compensation. With scheduled wage increases that correlate with economic indicators, the legislation seeks to raise the minimum wage standard across the state to promote financial stability among low-income workers. Notably, the bill also establishes provisions for adjusting wages in relation to fluctuations in the highest federal minimum wage, ensuring Connecticut’s minimum wage remains competitive and reflective of current economic conditions.

Summary

House Bill 5004, also known as Public Act No. 19-4, aims to increase the minimum fair wage in Connecticut over several years, ultimately reaching fifteen dollars per hour by June 1, 2023. The bill outlines specific incremental increases starting at eleven dollars per hour from October 1, 2019, and sets future adjustments based on the employment cost index calculated by the U.S. Department of Labor. The intent is to secure a living wage for workers across various industries by ensuring that wage levels keep pace with inflation and cost of living increases.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 5004 appears to be mixed, with supporters advocating for the increased minimum wage as a necessary measure for economic equity, while opponents express concerns over potential negative impacts on businesses, particularly small enterprises. Proponents believe that higher wages will lead to improved quality of life for workers, reduced poverty, and increased consumer spending. Conversely, critics warn that such mandates could result in job losses, decreased hours, and increased prices as businesses adjust to higher payroll costs.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 5004 involves the potential consequences for industries heavily reliant on gratuities, such as hospitality and restaurant sectors. While the bill includes stipulations about recognizing gratuity income in wage calculations, there remains apprehension regarding how the measures will affect workers' overall income. Furthermore, discussions arose about the implications of wage increases on employment rates and economic growth, especially in contexts of economic downturns, where the bill allows the Labor Commissioner to recommend suspending scheduled wage increases if negative economic growth is reported.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB648

Employment: gratuities: enforcement.

CA AB1003

Wage theft: grand theft.

CT HB06842

An Act Concerning The Minimum Fair Wage And Persons Employed At Cannabis Establishments.

TX HB4321

Relating to certain conflicts of interest of the commissioner of insurance and employees of the Texas Department of Insurance; requiring registration.

MN HF2874

Earned wage access services regulated.

MN SF3281

Earned wage access services regulation

CT SB01177

An Act Concerning One Fair Wage.

CT SB00221

An Act Concerning The Minimum Fair Wage And Service Charges.