| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 377 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 5121 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 377 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | REP. ZAWISTOWSKI, 61st Dist. | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | AN ACT CONCERNING THE PENALTY FOR SPOOFING. | |
| 19 | 19 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 20 | 20 | Assembly convened: | |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 22 | That section 16-256e of the general statutes be amended to make any 1 | |
| 23 | 23 | person using a device which transmits an unsolicited recorded 2 | |
| 24 | 24 | telephone message for any commercial, business or advertising 3 | |
| 25 | 25 | purpose to any telephone customer in the state and which continues 4 | |
| 26 | 26 | the call and message after the customer hangs up the receiver while 5 | |
| 27 | 27 | intentionally using a blocking device or service to circumvent a 6 | |
| 28 | 28 | telephone customer's use of a caller identification service or device 7 | |
| 29 | 29 | guilty of a class E felony. 8 | |
| 30 | 30 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 31 | 31 | To change the penalty for spoofing to a class E felony. |