Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05385

Introduced
1/16/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Refer
4/3/19  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Elimination Of Single-use Plastic Straws.

Impact

The implementation of HB 05385 is designed to minimize plastic waste generated by the food service industry, aligning with statewide goals of promoting environmentally friendly practices. The enforcement of this bill will be under the jurisdiction of local health departments, which can issue warnings for initial violations and fines for repeated breaching of the regulations. Such measures aim to encourage compliance while still allowing local governments the authority to adopt stricter ordinances related to plastic waste management, thereby fostering environmental accountability within communities.

Summary

House Bill 05385 is a legislative measure aimed at eliminating the usage of single-use plastic straws in full-service restaurants. Set to take effect on January 1, 2020, the bill stipulates that restaurants are prohibited from providing single-use plastic straws unless requested by the consumer, with an exception for individuals with disabilities. This legislation is framed within a broader push towards environmental sustainability and reducing plastic waste in the state. The definitions in the bill clarify what constitutes a single-use plastic straw and specify the kinds of establishments that are affected by this regulation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05385 reveals a generally supportive stance towards its objectives, with advocacy groups and environmentalists expressing approval. Proponents argue that the reduction of single-use plastics is critical to protecting the environment and public health. As the public grows increasingly aware of the detrimental impacts of plastic pollution, this bill is seen as part of a necessary trend towards sustainability. However, within the discussions, there exists caution regarding the potential financial implications for restaurant owners adapting to new regulations and the logistical challenges of compliance.

Contention

Despite the broad support, notable points of contention include concerns raised by some restaurant operators regarding the feasibility of implementing this change. Critics argue that the bill may inadvertently place an additional burden on businesses, particularly smaller establishments that may struggle with the transition. Furthermore, the language of the bill allows for local governments to create ordinances that may impose stricter rules, leading to a patchwork of regulations that could complicate operational compliance across different municipalities. This raised discussions on balancing environmental initiatives with the economic realities faced by the food service industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.