| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 948 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 5732 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 948 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | REP. PAVALOCK-D'AMATO, 77 | |
| 15 | 15 | th Dist. | |
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | ||
| 21 | 21 | AN ACT CONCERNING THE DEFENSE OF A PERSON'S DWELLING. | |
| 22 | 22 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 23 | 23 | Assembly convened: | |
| 24 | 24 | ||
| 25 | 25 | That section 53a-20 of the general statutes be amended to provide 1 | |
| 26 | 26 | that if a person believes that deadly physical force is necessary to 2 | |
| 27 | 27 | prevent or terminate an unlawful entry by force into such person's 3 | |
| 28 | 28 | dwelling or to prevent the commission of arson or a crime of violence 4 | |
| 29 | 29 | by a trespasser, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that such belief 5 | |
| 30 | 30 | was a reasonable belief. 6 | |
| 31 | 31 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 32 | 32 | To fully adopt the "castle doctrine" by establishing a rebuttable | |
| 33 | 33 | presumption that when a homeowner believes it necessary to use | |
| 34 | 34 | deadly force to repel an intruder then that belief is a reasonable belief. |