Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | LCO No. 1905 1 of 1 | |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 6390 | |
6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
7 | 7 | LCO No. 1905 | |
8 | 8 | ||
9 | 9 | ||
10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY | |
11 | 11 | ||
12 | 12 | ||
13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
14 | 14 | REP. CARPINO, 32nd Dist. | |
15 | 15 | ||
16 | 16 | ||
17 | 17 | ||
18 | 18 | AN ACT CONCERNING REIMBURSEMENTS TO FIRE COMPANIES | |
19 | 19 | FOR CALLS ON CERTAIN HIGHWAYS. | |
20 | 20 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
21 | 21 | Assembly convened: | |
22 | 22 | ||
23 | 23 | That the general statutes be amended to require the State Fire 1 | |
24 | 24 | Administrator to pay one hundred dollars to each fire company for 2 | |
25 | 25 | each call to which such company responds on any limited access 3 | |
26 | 26 | highway, the Berlin Turnpike, the South Meadows Expressway and 4 | |
27 | 27 | the section of route 8 that falls within the boundaries of Naugatuck 5 | |
28 | 28 | State Forest, provided with respect to the Berlin Turnpike, such sum 6 | |
29 | 29 | shall be paid only if such call concerns a fire involving a motor vehicle. 7 | |
30 | 30 | Statement of Purpose: | |
31 | 31 | To require the State Fire Administrator to reimburse fire companies | |
32 | 32 | that respond to certain calls. |