Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06921

Introduced
1/30/19  
Refer
1/30/19  
Refer
1/30/19  
Refer
3/19/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
5/10/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Report Pass
5/24/19  
Chaptered
6/24/19  
Enrolled
6/27/19  
Enrolled
6/27/19  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Council On The Collateral Consequences Of A Criminal Record.

Impact

If adopted, the council will consist of members from various state departments and external organizations, including representatives from human rights groups and community organizations. The council's responsibilities will include conducting at least three public forums to gather inputs from community members, ensuring that the perspectives of those affected are taken into account. By prioritizing collaboration among diverse stakeholders, the bill aims to produce actionable recommendations that can lead to policy reforms addressing the stigma and challenges faced by formerly incarcerated individuals in accessing employment, housing, and other essential services.

Summary

House Bill 06921 seeks to establish a Council on the Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record aimed at addressing the discrimination faced by individuals with criminal records in Connecticut. The proposed council is designed to study the various forms of discrimination that justice-impacted individuals encounter and to develop legislative recommendations that seek to reduce or eliminate these discriminatory practices. This initiative is an important step toward transforming the landscape of reentry for individuals with a criminal background, creating a pathway toward successful reintegration into society.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06921 is largely positive, with strong support from advocates for justice reform and anti-discrimination efforts. Proponents argue that creating a dedicated council is essential for ensuring that the needs of justice-impacted residents are prioritized within legislative discussions. However, there are still concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed measures and whether they will lead to substantial policy changes that create lasting impacts. Some skeptics question the power and authority of the council and whether it will be able to influence existing systemic barriers faced by individuals with a criminal record.

Contention

Notably, the bill represents a shift in the legislative approach towards individuals with criminal histories, recognizing their potential contributions to society when provided with the necessary support and opportunities. However, there may be points of contention regarding the extent to which the council's recommendations will be implemented, as legislative bodies may differ in their views on criminal justice reform. Thus, while the bill is a step forward, it will require ongoing advocacy to ensure that the council's findings lead to meaningful legislative changes that effectively reduce discrimination and promote equity for all residents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

CA AB1053

City selection committees: County of Los Angeles: quorum: teleconferencing.

CA SB925

City and County of San Francisco: merchandising sales.

AR HR1020

To Amend The Rules Of The House Of Representatives Of The Ninety-third General Assembly.

CA SB1031

San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation improvements.

OH HB164

Reinstate the Joint Education Oversight Committee

DC PR26-0002

Council Period 26 Appointment of Chairperson Pro Tempore, Committee Chairpersons, and Committee Membership Resolution of 2025

CA AB559

San Joaquin River Conservancy: governing board.