Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07088

Introduced
2/7/19  
Introduced
2/7/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Report Pass
3/14/19  
Report Pass
3/14/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Program Approval At Independent Institutions Of Higher Education.

Impact

The impact of HB 07088 on state laws includes a significant alteration in how independent institutions of higher education operate regarding program approvals. By reducing the regulatory burden, it seeks to provide these institutions with greater flexibility to innovate and respond to educational demands. However, the bill does maintain certain safeguards; institutions must uphold their eligibility for federal financial aid and remain accredited to enjoy the exemptions from approval processes. If an institution fails to meet the established criteria, their exempt status can be suspended for up to two years.

Summary

House Bill 07088, titled 'An Act Concerning Program Approval At Independent Institutions Of Higher Education,' is aimed at amending the requirements for program licensure and modifications for independent institutions in Connecticut. Under the provisions of this bill, independent institutions that have maintained accreditation and meet certain financial criteria will no longer be required to seek approval for new programs or modifications from the Office of Higher Education until July 1, 2020. This change seeks to streamline the process for these institutions, allowing them more autonomy in shaping their educational offerings while ensuring minimum standards remain intact.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 07088 is largely positive among proponents within the higher education sector. Supporters argue that the bill empowers institutions to adapt more rapidly to the evolving landscape of higher education, ultimately benefiting students by expanding educational opportunities. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential impacts on quality and accountability, particularly if oversight measures become less stringent.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between autonomy for independent institutions and the need for accountability in higher education. Critics voice concerns that easing approval processes could lead to a decline in educational standards and the quality of programs offered. Advocates for the bill argue that the existing accreditation processes, along with federal oversight, will sufficiently serve to maintain standards while allowing creativity and growth within the educational sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.