Connecticut House Bill HB07185

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 2/21/19
• Report Pass: 4/10/19
• Refer: 4/18/19
• Report Pass: 4/25/19
• Engrossed: 5/14/19
• Report Pass: 5/16/19

Caption

An Act Concerning Liability Of A Political Subdivision And Its Employees, Officers And Agents.

Impact

If enacted, HB 7185 would impact existing laws governing the liability of local governments and their employees. The bill explicitly outlines when a political subdivision is liable, including circumstances such as negligence in the performance of services that generate profit. It also sets a precedent that they are not liable for damages resulting from specific conditions or situations, like weather-related hazards, unpaved roads, or pollution caused by third parties. This adjustment aims to foster a safer operational environment for political subdivisions while possibly impacting individuals’ rights to seek damages against these entities.

Summary

House Bill 7185 proposes significant changes to the liability framework of political subdivisions in the state. The bill primarily amends Section 52-557n of the general statutes, outlining the circumstances under which political subdivisions and their employees, officers, and agents can be held liable for damages. The legislation aims to clarify and limit the liability of these entities, placing restrictions on accountability related to negligent acts and the condition of public properties, particularly in terms of natural land and unimproved property. This bill intends to reduce legal risks for political subdivisions while ensuring they remain accountable under certain conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 7185 appears generally supportive among proponents who argue it provides necessary protections for political subdivisions and their employees, allowing them to operate without the looming threat of lawsuits for every potential negligence claim. However, there are concerns among critics who believe this bill may overly restrict individuals’ ability to seek compensation for legitimate grievances against the government, potentially resulting in a lack of accountability for public officials and services.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the scope of immunity granted to political subdivisions, particularly concerning how this may impact public safety and citizens' trust in local government. Critics express fear that this bill could shield negligent actions from accountability more than necessary, thereby allowing local governments to neglect their duty in maintaining safe environments. Proponents, on the other hand, argue that it is crucial to protect public officials from frivolous lawsuits that hinder their decision-making and willingness to serve.