Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07322

Introduced
3/7/19  
Introduced
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/29/19  
Report Pass
3/29/19  
Refer
4/11/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Ballot Design.

Impact

The implications of HB 07322 are significant in terms of local election administration. By enforcing a standardized format for ballots, the bill aims to reduce confusion among voters and streamline the voting process. It reinforces the requirement for municipal clerks to file ballots with the Secretary of the State for approval, thereby ensuring that all ballots comply with state standards and regulations. This may help mitigate errors and improve the clarity of the voting experience, potentially increasing voter participation and confidence in the electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 07322 aims to amend several sections of the general statutes concerning the design and preparation of ballots used in both primary and general elections. It establishes guidelines that mandate ballots to be printed in plain, clear type in a standardized manner to ensure consistency across the voting process. The bill seeks to enhance clarity by ensuring that the type size and style used for candidates and political party names are uniform, thereby promoting fairness and accessibility in elections. It also outlines the responsibilities of municipal clerks in the preparation and approval of sample ballots before elections.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 07322 appears to be positive among proponents who advocate for improved electoral processes. Supporters laud the bill as a necessary step toward modernizing and standardizing the voting experience. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the additional responsibilities placed on municipal clerks and the associated costs. Such concerns highlight a tension between ensuring compliance with new standards and maintaining local flexibility in election administration.

Contention

While the bill is generally well-received, it has sparked discussions about its potential to inadvertently complicate local election processes. Some members of the legislature are wary of over-regulating election procedures at the state level, fearing it may hinder local jurisdictions' ability to address unique electoral challenges. Feature provisions of the bill, such as those regarding the timeline for candidacy certifications and changes to ballot content under exigent circumstances, have been points for debate among lawmakers, particularly regarding their practicality during actual elections.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB855

Voter registration: regulations.

CA AB2173

Department of Food and Agriculture: Fair and Exposition Fund: loans to fairs: deferral of loan repayment.

CA AB2123

District-based elections.

MI HB4602

Elections: voting equipment; control over creating the test deck process; clarify. Amends sec. 794a of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.794a).

IL HB4966

SPECIALTY PLATE FOR MOTORCYCLE

CA AB1411

Voter education and outreach plans.

AZ SB1237

Working animals; restrictions; prohibition

AZ SB1662

Candidate late fees; candidate ineligibility