Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07385

Introduced
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/12/19  
Refer
4/12/19  
Report Pass
4/18/19  
Report Pass
4/18/19  
Engrossed
5/20/19  
Engrossed
5/20/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Administrative Services And Changes To Affirmation, Affidavit And Certification Requirements For Large State Contracts.

Impact

The impact of HB 7385 is significant, as it alters the existing framework for state contracts by reinforcing ethical standards for individuals and entities involved in state acquisitions. By requiring that contractors provide written affirmations regarding their understanding and compliance with ethics laws, the bill enhances the integrity of the procurement process. It also includes provisions aimed at preventing discrimination, ensuring that all business practices comply with state nondiscrimination policies, thereby fostering an inclusive environment in public contracts.

Summary

House Bill 7385 primarily addresses changes in the state procurement process, specifically regarding large state contracts. The bill mandates that contractors, subcontractors, and consultants engaged in large state construction or procurement contracts must affirm understanding and compliance with state ethics laws. This requirement ensures that all parties maintain transparency and accountability in their dealings with state agencies, aiming to promote ethical conduct in public procurement activities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 7385 appears to be positive among proponents who see it as a necessary step towards improving the ethical landscape of state contracting. Advocates argue that by instituting such requirements, the bill will help reduce conflicts of interest and promote fair competition. However, some may view the additional requirements as burdensome, potentially complicating the bidding process for smaller contractors who may lack the resources to navigate these additional compliance measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill revolve around the potential impact on smaller contractors who may find the new affirmation requirements challenging. Critics argue that while the intentions behind the bill are commendable, the enhanced regulatory requirements could inadvertently tighten access to state contracts for smaller, minority-owned businesses. Balancing the need for ethical compliance with the need to encourage diversity and inclusion in state procurement remains a vital discussion point as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05012

An Act Concerning The Optimization Of State Agency Operations And Services.

CT HB06444

An Act Concerning The Modernization Of State Services And The Membership Of The Commission For Educational Technology.

CT SB00948

An Act Authorizing Guidelines For Programs To Reduce Student Costs And Exempting Constituent Unit Qualified, Revenue And Nonmonetary Contracts From Certain Statutory Requirements.

CT SB00151

An Act Concerning Contract Compliance Requirements For The Metropolitan District Of Hartford.

CT SB00882

An Act Concerning The State Set-aside Program, Filing Requirements Of State Contractors, Evaluation Of Contractors And Subcontractors And A Program To Increase Contracts Awarded To Resident Bidders.

CT SB00455

An Act Concerning The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

CT SB00383

An Act Concerning Workforce Participation Thresholds For Public Works Contracts.

CT HB05265

An Act Requiring The Prompt Payment Of Contractors.