Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07388

Introduced
3/20/19  
Introduced
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
4/18/19  

Caption

An Act Protecting A Mortgagor From An Unreasonable Invasion Of His Or Her Privacy By A Mortgage Holder.

Impact

The enactment of this bill is expected to enhance protections for homeowners, making it clear that mortgage holders cannot enter properties without owner consent or legal authorization. This change intends to reassure mortgagors that their privacy and possessory rights are legally protected, promoting a sense of security and stability within residential properties. By defining these rights, the bill aims to create balance in the relationship between mortgagees and mortgagors.

Summary

House Bill 7388 aims to safeguard the privacy of mortgagors, or homeowners, by restricting the rights of mortgage holders to enter residential properties without consent or a court order. The bill defines key terms such as 'mortgage,' 'mortgagor,' and 'mortgagee,' establishing a framework to protect homeowners from what it describes as unreasonable invasions of privacy. The bill is designed to prevent mortgagees from asserting unnecessary rights that could undermine homeowner security in their own residences.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 7388 appears to be generally positive, particularly among homeowner advocacy groups and privacy rights organizations. These groups celebrate the legislation as a necessary measure to reinforce the privacy of individuals within their homes. However, there may be some concerns from mortgage lenders or financial institutions regarding how these restrictions could impact their operational authority over foreclosures or property maintenance practices.

Contention

During discussions surrounding the bill, points of contention may arise regarding the extent to which these protections could hinder mortgagees from fulfilling their duties, such as ensuring properties are maintained and secured. Critics may argue that while privacy is essential, an absolute prohibition on entry could complicate property preservation efforts, especially in cases of abandonment. Therefore, the debate likely focuses on finding an adequate balance between privacy rights of homeowners and the legitimate needs of mortgage holders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.