Connecticut Senate Bill SB00011

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/19
• Refer: 1/9/19
• Refer: 3/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/19/19
• Refer: 4/1/19
• Report Pass: 4/8/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Authorization Of A Casino Gaming Facility In East Windsor.

Impact

The passage of SB00011 is anticipated to significantly affect the state's gaming laws by expanding gambling opportunities and contributing to state revenue through gaming taxes. It creates a regulated environment for the operation of the casino, which includes maintaining conditions that ensure the tribes' contributions to the state from the gambling revenues are upheld. Moreover, the bill stipulates that the authorization does not eliminate existing moratoriums on certain types of games, specifically video facsimile games, which reflects the continuing restrictions designed to balance gaming interests and state regulations.

Summary

SB00011 is a legislative bill authorizing MMCT Venture, LLC, to operate a casino gaming facility located at 171 Bridge Street, East Windsor, Connecticut. This bill modifies existing agreements and compacts with the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe and the Mohegan Tribe, allowing them to conduct authorized games while retaining essential regulatory structures. By permitting this casino, the bill aims to enhance the state’s gaming industry and provide an opportunity for economic growth in the region.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00011 has been mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will not only boost local employment and tourism but will also generate much-needed revenue for the state. They view this as a strategic move to capitalize on the increasing competitiveness of the gambling market in surrounding areas. Conversely, detractors express concerns about the social impacts of expanding gambling, including potential increases in problem gambling and the long-term implications on the local community.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB00011 revolves around the perceived benefits versus risks of expanding casino operations. Opponents argue that additional casinos can lead to negative social outcomes such as increased gambling addiction, crime rates, and economic dependency on gambling revenue. The discussions also raised questions about tribal sovereignty and the extent to which the state can regulate these operations while respecting the rights and agreements with the tribes involved. The bill's approval reflects a complex negotiation between economic ambitions and social responsibilities.