Connecticut Senate Bill SB00354

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/19
• Refer: 1/23/19

Caption

An Act Restricting The Use Of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System And Vapor Products.

Impact

This bill is designed to amend existing statutes related to the sale and distribution of nicotine products, thereby strengthening regulations on vaping. Among its measures, SB354 introduces an excise tax on the sale of ENDS and vapor products, which could serve to discourage consumption by increasing prices. Furthermore, it proposes an increase in penalties for retailers who violate age restrictions, raising fines for first offenses to one thousand dollars and mandating the revocation of dealer registration certificates after repeated violations. Such changes aim to hold sellers accountable and reduce illegal sales to minors.

Summary

Senate Bill 354 proposes significant restrictions on the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and vapor products. This legislation aims to protect youth by raising the minimum legal age for purchasing and possessing these products from eighteen to twenty-one years old. Additionally, the bill mandates that sellers display warnings about the health risks associated with these products, including addiction and potential damage to young, developing bodies. The intention is to mitigate the impact of vaping on adolescents and young adults, who may be particularly susceptible to nicotine addiction and other health issues.

Contention

The discussions around SB354 have revealed notable points of contention, particularly regarding its potential impact on small businesses and the broader debate about personal freedoms versus public health. Supporters of the bill emphasize the necessity of protecting youth from the dangers of nicotine addiction, arguing that the increase in vaping among teenagers is alarming and requires comprehensive legislative action. Conversely, some opponents raise concerns about the implications of government overreach into personal choices and the livelihood of businesses that sell these products. They argue that increased taxation and fines could disproportionately affect small retailers and question the efficacy of raising the legal age in significantly curbing youth access to these products.