Connecticut Senate Bill SB00479

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/19
• Refer: 1/24/19
• Refer: 2/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/6/19
• Refer: 3/15/19
• Report Pass: 3/21/19

Caption

An Act Designating Election Day As A State Holiday.

Impact

The impact of SB00479 on state laws is significant, as it alters the list of designated state holidays to include Election Day. This change not only formalizes the status of Election Day but also places it on par with other major public holidays, such as Independence Day and Labor Day. Schools and businesses could be required to close or modify their hours accordingly. This legislative action reflects an effort to foster a political climate that encourages higher turnout during elections by reducing barriers associated with a typical workday.

Summary

SB00479, also known as 'An Act Designating Election Day As A State Holiday', aims to officially recognize Election Day as a public holiday. By doing so, the bill seeks to increase voter participation by making it easier for citizens to access polling places without the hindrance of work or other obligations. The designation of Election Day as a state holiday aligns with similar moves seen across various jurisdictions throughout the country, emphasizing the importance of civic engagement in the electoral process.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB00479 is largely positive, especially among advocacy groups that promote voter access and engagement. Supporters believe that establishing Election Day as a holiday will benefit underrepresented communities who may struggle to vote due to work commitments. Opponents, however, might express concerns regarding the economic implications of closing businesses on this day, though such objections seem to be less prominent in the discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates about the potential economic impact on local businesses and whether the designation of a state holiday for Election Day could lead to unintended consequences, such as decreased availability of public services on that day. While the bill is primarily seen as a step towards enhancing democratic participation, these concerns reflect a broader discussion on balancing civic duty and economic considerations in state legislation.