Connecticut Senate Bill SB00546

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/19
• Refer: 1/24/19

Caption

An Act Limiting The Use Of Eminent Domain By Municipalities And Municipal Development Agencies And Establishing An Office Of Property Rights Ombudsman.

Impact

If enacted, SB00546 would significantly alter the landscape of property rights in the state. Municipalities would find their ability to use eminent domain curtailed, which proponents argue is a necessary reform to protect citizens from potential abuses of government power. The establishment of the Office of Property Rights Ombudsman is expected to provide a structured way for property owners to contest eminent domain actions and seek arbitration in disputes. The requirement for public agencies to negotiate reasonably with property owners prior to initiating eminent domain actions is another critical feature that could lead to more equitable outcomes for affected individuals.

Summary

SB00546 is a legislative proposal introduced to limit the use of eminent domain by municipalities and municipal development agencies. The bill aims to amend existing statutes to eliminate the authority of these entities to acquire property within designated municipal development project areas. This proposed change is intended to strengthen property rights for individuals by reducing the circumstances under which government agencies can seize private property for public purposes. Additionally, the bill proposes the establishment of an Office of Property Rights Ombudsman, which would facilitate better communication and negotiation processes between property owners and public agencies regarding eminent domain disputes.

Contention

However, the bill may spark contention among various stakeholders. Proponents of property rights are likely to support the limitations on eminent domain, viewing them as essential to safeguarding individual freedoms. On the other hand, some municipal leaders and development advocates may express concern that restricting eminent domain could hinder necessary public projects or urban development initiatives. The debate around SB00546 will likely revolve around finding a balance between protecting individual property rights and allowing municipalities to carry out significant public development projects.