| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 2724 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 645 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 2724 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION | |
| 11 | 11 | AND ELECTIONS | |
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | ||
| 14 | 14 | Introduced by: | |
| 15 | 15 | SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist. | |
| 16 | 16 | SEN. WITKOS, 8th Dist. | |
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | ||
| 21 | 21 | AN ACT CONCERNING REVIEW AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS | |
| 22 | 22 | BY THE STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION. | |
| 23 | 23 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 24 | 24 | Assembly convened: | |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | 26 | That section 9-7a of the general statutes be amended to provide that 1 | |
| 27 | 27 | (1) the State Elections Enforcement Commission shall (A) establish a 2 | |
| 28 | 28 | dormancy docket consisting of any complaint or enforcement action 3 | |
| 29 | 29 | that has not been acted upon in a certain amount of time, and (B) 4 | |
| 30 | 30 | prescribe the timeline and procedures for review of any such 5 | |
| 31 | 31 | complaint or enforcement action for dismissal due to such inaction, 6 | |
| 32 | 32 | and (2) the respondent or respondents to any such complaint or 7 | |
| 33 | 33 | enforcement action may bring an interlocutory appeal to the Superior 8 | |
| 34 | 34 | Court if such complaint or enforcement action has been ongoing for 9 | |
| 35 | 35 | two years and no hearing thereon has been held. 10 | |
| 36 | 36 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 37 | 37 | To establish procedures for the timely review and disposition of | |
| 38 | 38 | certain election complaints. |