Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00683

Introduced
1/28/19  
Refer
1/28/19  
Refer
1/28/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Report Pass
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/4/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Penalty For Late Payments Of State Contractors By Third-party Entities.

Impact

If enacted, SB00683 would amend existing state laws regarding contracts made by state departments and agencies, explicitly increasing accountability among third-party entities responsible for processing payments. By instituting penalties for delays, the bill seeks to improve the cash flow for contractors and reduce potential financial hardships arising from late payments. This could enhance the overall effectiveness and reliability of the state’s procurement system, encouraging more entities to participate in governmental contracts.

Summary

SB00683 aims to address issues related to late payments made by third-party entities to state contractors in Connecticut. The bill mandates a penalty for failure to make timely payments, specifying that state agencies must pay interest on late payments and that contracts with third-party providers must include penalties for any delays in payments to state contractors. The legislation is designed to ensure that state contractors are compensated promptly for their work, thereby providing better financial security and predictability for those engaged in government contracts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00683 appears positive, with strong support from stakeholders who advocate for fair treatment of contractors who often face financial strain from delayed payments. Through its provisions a clearer framework is provided for payment timelines and repercussions, which proponents argue is necessary to foster a more equitable relationship between state agencies and contractors. However, there may be concerns from third-party payment processors regarding the feasibility of adhering to these new requirements without additional resources.

Contention

There could be some contention regarding how strictly these penalties will be applied and the administrative burden they may impose on agencies and third-party providers. Critics might argue that imposing penalties could complicate the contract processes, while supporters believe it will ultimately lead to a more efficient system that prioritizes timely compensation for contractors. The balance between rigorous enforcement of these penalties and maintaining efficient payment processing will be crucial to the bill's successful implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05470

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CT HB05376

An Act Concerning Home Improvement Contractors And Salespersons.

CT HB05275

An Act Concerning Audits Of Certain Nonstate Entities Receiving State Financial Assistance.

CT SB00398

An Act Concerning The Regulation And Taxation Of Travel Insurance And Associated Entities, Products And Professionals.

CT SB00390

An Act Concerning Penalties For Certain Election Crimes.

CT SB00372

An Act Concerning A Working Group To Study Payments By Insurance Companies For Deposit Into The Insurance Fund.

CT SB00389

An Act Concerning The State Contracting Standards Board And State Procurement.

CT SB00446

An Act Concerning Payments In Lieu Of Taxes.

CT HB05477

An Act Concerning Penalties For Blight Upon Real Property, Municipal Agreements To Fix Assessments And A Personal Property Tax Exemption.

CT SB00412

An Act Concerning The Protection Of Warehouse Workers In The State.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.