Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00964

Introduced
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Chaptered
6/13/19  
Chaptered
6/13/19  
Enrolled
6/19/19  
Enrolled
6/19/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

Impact

The bill proposes significant changes to existing statutes regarding court operations. For instance, modifications include repealing outdated provisions and substituting them with contemporary guidelines that clarify the responsibilities and operating procedures of various courts within the state. This update is expected to enhance the efficiency of court operations, potentially reducing backlog and wait times for hearings and judgements. Changes also involve adjustments to how appeals are processed and how cases of juvenile matters are handled, which reflects an intention to improve the overall judicial experience for both plaintiffs and defendants.

Summary

Senate Bill 00964, also known as the Act Concerning Court Operations, focuses on reforming various aspects of court procedures in the state. The bill aims to streamline the judicial process by specifying the jurisdictions for different court cases and establishing clearer requirements for filing civil actions. It seeks to ensure that cases are heard in appropriate venues based on the judicial district specified, which could lead to improvements in both efficiency and accessibility for residents engaging with the court system.

Sentiment

Legislative discussions surrounding SB 00964 have generally been approached with a pragmatic attitude. The bill has received support from many who view the reforms as necessary for modernizing the judicial system and addressing the practical issues that have arisen in court operations. However, some concerns have been voiced regarding the implications these changes may have on vulnerable populations, particularly in matters relating to family courts and the support services available to them. This balance of efficiency versus essential legal protections is a contentious aspect of the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the impacts on family courts, specifically how the appointment and remuneration of family support magistrates will be structured and funded under the new provisions. Discussions have raised concerns regarding whether the proposed changes would adequately protect the rights of children and families engaged in legal proceedings. Additionally, there is apprehension about the potential for increased costs in administrative processes and whether these reforms will genuinely yield the promised efficiencies or create new challenges for users of the judicial system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00121

An Act Concerning The Attorney General, The Banking Commissioner, The Dodd-frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act And Telephonic Sales Calls For Soliciting Consumer Goods Or Services.

CT HB05317

An Act Concerning The Office Of The Attorney General And The Dodd-frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act.

CT HB06505

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

CT SB00360

An Act Concerning The Transcript Fees Charged By Official Court Reporters And Court Reporting Monitors.

CT HB06595

An Act Concerning The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

CT HB06681

An Act Concerning The Office Of The Attorney General And The Dodd-frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act.

CT SB00284

An Act Creating A Division Of Administrative Hearings.

OK HB2131

Criminal procedure; procedures for advising grand juries; transcripts; hearings; witnesses; effective date.