Connecticut Senate Bill SB00990

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/19
• Refer: 2/28/19
• Report Pass: 3/21/19
• Refer: 4/1/19
• Report Pass: 4/8/19
• Refer: 4/17/19

Caption

An Act Concerning Call Centers And Notice Of Closure.

Impact

If implemented, SB 00990 would significantly affect state laws regarding employment and the operation of call centers. Employers listed as having relocated operations would face restrictions, such as being ineligible for state grants, loans, or financial benefits for five years post-relocation. By compiling an annual public list of these employers, the bill also promotes accountability and attempts to protect jobs within the state. This preemptive move reflects a growing concern over job security in the wake of economic changes.

Summary

Senate Bill 00990, also known as the Act Concerning Call Centers and Notice of Closure, aims to regulate the relocation of call centers within the state. The bill mandates that call center employers intending to move their operations—specifically if the relocation involves transferring at least 30% of their total operational volume—must notify the Labor Commissioner at least 100 days prior to such an action. This effort is designed to provide transparency and mitigate the potential job losses associated with such relocations.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding the bill is mixed. Supporters argue that it is necessary for protecting jobs and holding businesses accountable for their operational decisions. On the other hand, detractors warn that such regulations could discourage businesses from setting up call centers in the state in the first place, potentially affecting job creation negatively. The balance between job protection and economic growth is a central theme in the debate, revealing anxieties about the consequences of state intervention in business decisions.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the perceptions that SB 00990 may either help preserve jobs or dissuade businesses from choosing to operate within the state. Critics fear the legislation could lead to unintended consequences, such as companies moving operations out of the state altogether to avoid the regulatory burdens imposed. There are also concerns about the practical implementation of the notification process and how effectively it can safeguard jobs in the face of inevitable economic shifts.