Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01000

Introduced
3/5/19  
Introduced
3/5/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Apple Assessments.

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts the financial landscape for apple producers by establishing a mechanism for funding related to the apple market order. The requirement for assessments would enable better management and enhancement of the apple market within the state, potentially leading to improved pricing stability and market conditions. Furthermore, the bill stipulates civil penalties for producers who fail to comply with these assessments, which reinforces adherence to the regulations put forth.

Summary

SB01000, titled 'An Act Concerning Apple Assessments', aims to implement a structured assessment system for apple producers in the state. The bill places a financial obligation on apple producers to pay an assessment to the Commissioner of Agriculture to cover the costs associated with the implementation of a market order for apples. The assessment is set at a minimum of one hundred dollars, with additional criteria determining the total due based on units sold or removed from storage. The first one thousand first sale units of each producer are exempt from this assessment to alleviate initial financial burdens.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01000 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the financial assessments are reasonable and necessary for bolstering the apple industry, believing that such initiatives can improve market oversight and producer support. However, there are concerns from opponents regarding the financial pressure this may place on smaller apple producers, who may struggle with additional costs in an already competitive market. The discussions reflect a deep concern about the balance between regulatory support and financial feasibility for producers.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the necessity and fairness of the assessments imposed, particularly the requirement for a referendum to approve any assessment exceeding six cents per first sale unit. This stipulation could lead to contentious debates among producers regarding the appropriateness of assessment levels and how they are determined. Additionally, ensuring compliance and protecting producers from hefty penalties for noncompliance could further complicate the reception of the bill among industry stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.