Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01047

Introduced
3/7/19  
Introduced
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
4/1/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Ballot Access For Petitioning Candidates.

Impact

The bill, set to take effect on July 1, 2019, directly impacts the general statutes related to election procedures by repealing and substituting existing statutes governing the nomination of candidates. By lowering the signature threshold for petitioning candidates, the legislation enhances voter choice and encourages individuals to engage in the political system. This has the potential to diversify the range of candidates on the ballot, leading to more competitive elections and increased representation of varying political viewpoints.

Summary

SB01047, also known as An Act Concerning Ballot Access For Petitioning Candidates, was introduced to facilitate the nomination process for candidates who petition for a position within a political party. This bill modifies the requirements for filing candidacies for state offices, aiming to ensure that eligible candidates can have their names included on the ballot, thus promoting broader participation in the electoral process. It sets forth specific provisions regarding the required percentage of signatures from enrolled party members for nomination, as well as the process for filing these candidacies with the Secretary of State.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01047 appears to be generally supportive among advocates for electoral reform and increased political participation. Proponents argue that the changes will democratize the process by making it easier for candidates who may not have the backing of established political parties to run for office. Concerns may arise from traditional party members who feel that such measures could undermine the established nomination processes that ensure candidates are vetted before appearing on the ballot.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill focus on the balance between facilitating access for new candidates and maintaining the integrity and organization of the electoral process. Critics may argue that easing the signature requirements could lead to an influx of less viable candidates, complicating the ballot and potentially leading to voter confusion. Furthermore, there is ongoing debate about whether this bill effectively addresses the barriers some candidates face, or if it simply replicates existing issues in new forms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB06077

An Act Establishing A Process For The Addition Of Statues To The State Capitol Building, A Plan For Signage Around Said Building And A State Historical Commission.

CT HB06111

An Act Concerning The Uniform Military And Overseas Voters Act.

CT SB01029

An Act Concerning Revisions To Campaign Finance Laws.

Similar Bills

CT HB05528

An Act Concerning Revisions To Election Laws.

CT HB06332

An Act Concerning Primaries, Petition And Ballot Preparation Laws.

CT SB01049

An Act Concerning Modern Elections.

CT HB05280

An Act Concerning Administrative Changes To Elections.

CT SB01516

An Act Concerning The Secretary Of The State's Recommendations Related To Voting And Elections In This State.

VA HB440

Candidates for office; electronic filing of forms, petitions, and notifications.

LA HB1162

Provides for procedures relative to recall elections

CT HB05498

An Act Concerning Election Security And Transparency, The Counting Of Absentee Ballots, Absentee Voting For Certain Patients Of Nursing Homes, Security Of Certain Election Workers, State Elections Enforcement Commission Complaints, Ballots Made Available In Languages Other Than English And Various Other Revisions Related To Election Administration.