Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01048

Introduced
3/7/19  
Introduced
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Chaptered
6/20/19  
Enrolled
6/24/19  
Passed
7/8/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Online Database For State Expenditures.

Impact

The introduction of this bill is poised to significantly affect the way state financial information is disseminated and accessed by the public. By centralizing the data under the Comptroller's office, the legislation attempts to streamline reporting processes among state agencies, ensuring timely and accurate updates to the online databases. This move is expected to facilitate better oversight for both lawmakers and citizens seeking information on state expenditures. Enhanced accessibility to expenditure data will likely promote informed public discourse regarding government spending and fiscal accountability.

Summary

SB01048, known as the Act Concerning the Online Database for State Expenditures, aims to enhance transparency and accountability in government spending by establishing a publicly accessible online database for state and quasi-public agency expenditures. This legislation mandates that the Comptroller maintain searchable electronic databases that include information on state contracts, grants, employee payroll, and pensions. This shift from the previous responsibility held by the legislative Office of Fiscal Analysis strengthens the role of the Comptroller in overseeing state financial data management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01048 appears to be largely positive, as many legislators see the establishment of an online database as a necessary step towards improved governmental transparency. Supporters argue that it will empower citizens, enhance public trust, and encourage responsible governance by making spending data readily available. However, there are concerns, particularly around data security and the potential challenges in maintaining the accuracy of the information provided in these databases.

Contention

Though the general sentiment appears to favor increased transparency, there are notable points of contention regarding the implementation of the bill. Critics express apprehension about the adequacy of resources allocated for the maintenance of the database and the potential for overwhelming amounts of data without adequate context for interpretation. Additionally, there are questions about how effectively state agencies will adapt to the new requirements and whether the bill sufficiently protects sensitive data from disclosure. These aspects of the bill suggest an ongoing conversation about balancing transparency with the need to safeguard certain information.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.