Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05117

Introduced
2/13/20  
Introduced
2/13/20  
Refer
2/13/20  
Refer
2/13/20  
Report Pass
3/3/20  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Office Recommendations Regarding Technical Revisions To The Higher Education Statutes.

Impact

If enacted, HB05117 would reform the criteria that for-profit institutions must meet in order to apply for institutional licensure or accreditation in Connecticut. Specifically, it mandates that any for-profit institution requiring students to agree to potentially restrictive clauses concerning claims against the institution must disclose the number of claims made against them by current or former students. This could lead to more accountability for these institutions and ensure that prospective students are better informed about any legal disputes involving their school.

Summary

House Bill 05117 addresses recommendations made by the Legislative Commissioners' Office regarding technical revisions to the higher education statutes. The bill seeks to regulate for-profit institutions of higher education operating within the state, particularly focusing on their enrollment practices and the conditions under which students agree to participate in class actions or claim assertions. The main thrust of the bill is to ensure that students are provided with clear, transparent information regarding their rights and the claims they may make against these institutions, enhancing consumer protection in the educational domain.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise concerning the balance of regulatory authority and student rights. Advocates for increased regulation argue that such transparency is critical to protect students from unfair practices by for-profit institutions. Conversely, opponents of the bill may argue that it could impose unnecessary burdens on these institutions, making it more difficult for them to operate effectively while potentially deterring students who could benefit from alternative educational forms, such as distance learning programs. The requirement for out-of-state institutions to adhere to specific operational standards may also spark debate about the equitable treatment of educational providers.

Discussion

The conversation surrounding HB05117 reflects broader issues within the higher education landscape, particularly related to the growing prevalence of for-profit institutions. Stakeholders are likely to debate the implications of the bill not only for the institutions themselves but also for the future of higher education standards and student protections in Connecticut. As the bill progresses, careful consideration of its potential impacts and the perspectives of both supporters and opponents will be essential.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.