Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07003

Introduced
9/30/20  
Engrossed
9/30/20  
Passed
10/1/20  
Passed
10/1/20  
Enrolled
10/1/20  
Enrolled
10/1/20  
Passed
10/2/20  
Chaptered
10/8/20  
Enrolled
10/16/20  

Caption

An Act Revising The State Hemp Program In Accordance With Federal Requirements.

Impact

The bill is significant in revising state laws to align with federal standards, particularly concerning the acceptable THC levels in hemp products, which must not exceed 0.3% on a dry weight basis. This adjustment not only legitimizes hemp production but also facilitates commerce in hemp and its derivatives, making it easier for producers to legally access market opportunities while adhering to stringent quality controls. Additionally, the bill stipulates necessary licensing and record-keeping requirements for producers and manufacturers, fostering greater accountability within the industry.

Summary

House Bill No. 7003 aims to revise the state hemp program in accordance with federal requirements and establish a framework for the cultivation and manufacturing of hemp products. The bill emphasizes compliance with federal regulations regarding hemp production, which are critical following the legalization of hemp at the federal level. It seeks to create a structured regulatory environment, encouraging responsible production practices and ensuring that hemp-derived products meet safety and quality standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 7003 appears largely favorable, as it represents a step towards modernizing agricultural regulations in light of changing federal policies. Supporters, including farmers and agricultural advocates, view the bill as a progressive move that will promote economic growth and innovation in the hemp industry. However, there are some critiques regarding the potential regulatory burdens imposed on small producers, which could complicate their ability to enter the market.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the regulatory framework's complexity and its compliance costs, particularly for smaller farmers who may struggle with administrative requirements. Critics argue that while the intention to regulate is necessary for safety, overly stringent licensing and testing procedures could hinder market entry for new producers, potentially slowing the industry's growth. Balancing effective regulation with accessibility for small growers is a key issue under discussion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00893

An Act Concerning A Pilot Program For Hemp Production.

CT SB00452

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State's Hemp Program.

CT SB00970

An Act Concerning Cannabinoids, Hemp And Hemp Products.

CT HB06099

An Act Concerning Antitrust Issues And The Palliative Use Of Marijuana And The Sale Of Hemp And Hemp Products.

CT HB06697

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB06699

An Act Concerning Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

GA SB494

'Georgia Hemp Farming Act'; hemp products; regulate