| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 1458 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 5620 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2021 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 1458 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on EDUCATION | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | REP. MCGEE, 5th Dist. | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | AN ACT CONCERNING STUDENT -CENTERED FUNDING. | |
| 19 | 19 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 20 | 20 | Assembly convened: | |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 22 | That chapter 172 of the general statutes be amended to (1) revise the 1 | |
| 23 | 23 | formula used to calculate a town's equalization aid grant by increasing 2 | |
| 24 | 24 | the weight for English language learners to twenty-five per cent, 3 | |
| 25 | 25 | increasing the concentrated poverty weight to fifteen per cent, reducing 4 | |
| 26 | 26 | the concentrated poverty threshold to sixty per cent, and fully phasing-5 | |
| 27 | 27 | in such revised formula for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, (2) 6 | |
| 28 | 28 | replace the existing funding levels for interdistrict magnet schools, state 7 | |
| 29 | 29 | charter schools, regional agricultural science and technology education 8 | |
| 30 | 30 | centers, and the open choice program with a new weighted funding 9 | |
| 31 | 31 | amount per pupil based on student need, and (3) repeal the charging of 10 | |
| 32 | 32 | tuition for interdistrict magnet schools and regional agricultural science 11 | |
| 33 | 33 | and technology education centers. 12 | |
| 34 | 34 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 35 | 35 | To make revisions to how public education is funded in the state to | |
| 36 | 36 | address issues of equity and systemic racism. |