Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06107 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 10/07/2021

                    O F F I C E O F L E G I S L A T I V E R E S E A R C H 
P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 
  	Page 1 
PA 21-29—sHB 6107   
Planning and Development Committee 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING TH E ZONING ENABLING AC T, ACCESSORY 
APARTMENTS, TRAINING FOR CERTAIN LAND USE OFFICIALS, 
MUNICIPAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLANS AND A COMMISSION 
ON CONNECTICUT’S DEV ELOPMENT AND FUTURE 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
 
§§ 1, 6, 7 & 10 — AS OF RIGHT ACCESSORY APARTMENTS 
Requires municipalities that zone under CGS § 8-2 to adopt or amend regulations to allow ADUs 
as of right on the same lot as single-family homes unless they follow the act’s opt-out process; 
specifies that these units will not count toward a municipality’s base housing stock calculation for 
purposes of the Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure (CGS § 8-30g); modifies the 
definition of ADU for purposes of the appeals procedure; specifies that the addition of an ADU on 
a lot does not make the sewerage system a “community sewerage system” 
§ 2 — APPLICATION AND TECHNICAL CONSULTANT FEE S 
Limits municipal authority to charge disproportionality higher land use application fees for larger 
residential projects; authorizes municipalities to charge technical consultant fees 
§§ 3 & 4 — CGS § 8-2: REORGANIZATION AND MINOR CHANGES 
Reorganizes the Zoning Enabling Act (CGS § 8-2, which applies to municipalities exercising 
zoning powers under the statutes) and makes minor, technical, and conforming changes 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: REQUIRED GOALS AND CONSIDERATIONS 
Eliminates a requirement that zoning regulations be (1) designed to prevent overcrowding and 
undue population concentration and (2) made with reasonable consideration as to the 
“character” of a district; requires that regulations provide for varied housing opportunities and 
affirmatively further the purposes of the federal Fair Housing Act; requires regulations to be 
designed to protect historic, tribal, cultural, and environmental resources 
§§ 4 & 5 — CGS § 8-2: PROHIBITED PROVISIONS 
Prohibits regulations from (1) prohibiting cottage food operations in a residential zone; (2) 
placing a cap on the number of dwellings in multifamily, middle, or mixed-use developments; or 
(3) establishing minimum floor area requirements for dwelling units; limits local authority to 
require the provision of parking spaces 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: OPTIONS FOR PROMOTING CONSERVATION 
Expands the energy conservation tools and renewable energy types a municipality can promote, 
including explicitly authorizing regulations to require certain conservation measures 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: REGULATING MOBILE MANUFACTURED HOMES 
Specifies how regulations must treat mobile manufactured homes and associated lots  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 2 of 14  
§ 8 — ZONING ENFORCEMENT O FFICER CERTIFICATION 
Beginning January 1, 2023, requires all appointed ZEOs to obtain and maintain certification from 
the state’s professional ZEO association 
§ 9 — BIENNIAL TRAINING FOR CERTAIN LAND USE OFFICIALS 
Requires local planning and zoning officials to complete at least four hours of training biennially 
§ 11 — WATER POLLUTION CONT ROL PLANS 
Allows WPCAs to add information about sewer system capacity for certain areas to municipal 
water pollution control plans 
§ 12 — AFFORDABLE HOUSING P LANNING REQUIREMENT 
Specifies that municipalities must prepare and adopt their first plans by June 1, 2022; requires 
plans to be submitted to OPM 
§ 13 — COMMISSION ON CONNEC TICUT’S DEVELOPMENT AND 
FUTURE 
Establishes a commission within the Legislative Department to evaluate policies related to land 
use, conservation, housing affordability, and infrastructure 
BACKGROUND 
 
 
§§ 1, 6, 7 & 10 — AS OF RIGHT ACCESSORY APARTMENTS 
 
Requires municipalities that zone under CGS § 8-2 to adopt or amend regulations to allow ADUs 
as of right on the same lot as single-family homes unless they follow the act’s opt-out process; 
specifies that these units will not count toward a municipality’s base housing stock calculation for 
purposes of the Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure (CGS § 8-30g); modifies the 
definition of ADU for purposes of the appeals procedure; specifies that the addition of an ADU on 
a lot does not make the sewerage system a “community sewerage system” 
 
Definitions 
 
Under the act, an “accessory apartment” (also referred to as an accessory 
dwelling unit or “ADU”) means a separate dwelling unit that (1) is located on the 
same lot as a principal dwelling unit of greater square footage; (2) has cooking 
facilities; and (3) complies with or is otherwise exempt from any applicable 
building code, fire code, and health and safety regulations. 
The act specifies that “as of right” means able to be approved without 
requiring (1) a public hearing; (2) a variance, special permit, or special exception; 
or (3) other discretionary zoning action, other than a determination that a site plan 
conforms with applicable zoning regulations. 
 
Regulation Adoption Requirement  
 
The act requires municipalities that exercise powers under CGS § 8-2 (the  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 3 of 14  
Zoning Enabling Act) to adopt regulations (1) allowing one ADU as of right on 
each lot that contains a single-family dwelling and (2) designating other areas 
where ADUs are allowed. But the act also creates an opt-out process, as described 
below. 
The act specifies that municipalities cannot require as of right ADUs sharing a 
lot with a single-family home to be preserved for lower-income families (i.e., an 
“affordable accessory apartment,” which, generally, is a deed restricted unit made 
affordable for households with incomes that do not exceed 80% of the median 
income).   
If a municipality does not opt out and does not amend or adopt ADU 
regulations by January 1, 2023, the act requires the municipality to review ADU 
permit applications in accordance with the act’s regulation requirements until the 
regulations are amended or adopted. A municipality may not use or impose 
additional standards beyond those set forth in the act. The act deems 
noncompliant regulations to be null and void.   
 
Opt-Out Process 
 
Until January 1, 2023, the act allows municipalities to opt out of the act’s as 
of right ADU provisions. To do so, the municipality’s zoning or combined 
planning and zoning commission must: 
1. first hold a public hearing on the proposed opt-out, subject to the standard 
notice and timeframes for such hearings; 
2. affirmatively decide by a two-thirds vote to opt out within the statutory 
time limit (generally within 65 days of the hearing’s completion); 
3. state in the record the reasons for its decision; and 
4. publish notice of the decision within 15 days in a newspaper that has 
substantial circulation in the municipality. 
The act requires the opt-out to be confirmed by a two-thirds vote of the 
municipal legislative body (or if it is a town meeting, the board of selectmen). 
 
As of Right Permitting 
 
The act requires regulations to establish an as of right permit application and 
review process for ADUs. The process must require the zoning or planning and 
zoning commission to decide within 65 days after an application unless an 
applicant approves an extension or extensions of up to 65 days total or withdraws 
the application.   
Under the act, municipalities cannot condition ADU approval on the 
correction of a nonconforming use, structure, or lot or require fire sprinklers 
unless they are also required in the principal dwelling or by the fire code. 
 
Regulation Contents 
 
Under the act, the ADU zoning regulations must: 
1. allow attached and detached ADUs and ADUs contained within the  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 4 of 14  
principal dwelling unit; 
2. set a maximum net floor area for ADUs that is the lesser of (a) at least 
30% of the principal dwelling’s net floor area or (b) 1,000 square feet (but 
regulations may allow a larger net floor area for ADUs); 
3. require setbacks, lot size, and building frontage less than or equal to that 
which is required for the principal dwelling; 
4. require lot coverage greater than or equal to that which is required for the 
principal dwelling; and  
5. provide for height, landscaping, and architectural design standards that do 
not exceed standards applied to single-family dwellings in the 
municipality. 
Regulations cannot require: 
1. a passageway between the ADU and principal dwelling; 
2. an exterior door for an ADU, except as required by the applicable building 
or fire code;  
3. more than one parking space for the ADU or fees in lieu of parking;  
4. a familial, marital, or employment relationship between the principal 
dwelling unit’s occupants and the ADU’s occupants; 
5. a minimum age for ADU occupants;  
6. separate billing of utilities otherwise connected to, or used by, the 
principal dwelling unit; or  
7. periodic ADU permit renewal. 
The act further specifies that it does not supersede applicable building code 
requirements or other requirements where a well or private sewerage system is 
being used, provided approval for any such accessory apartment must not be 
unreasonably withheld.   
Additionally, the act prohibits municipalities, special districts, and sewer or 
water authorities from (1) considering an ADU to be a new residential use for the 
purposes of calculating connection fees or capacity charges for utilities, including 
water and sewer service, unless the ADU was constructed with a new single-
family dwelling on the same lot or (2) requiring the installation of a new or 
separate utility connection directly to an ADU or imposing a related connection 
fee or capacity charge.   
Under existing law, a community sewer system is a sewer system service for 
at least two residences in separate structures that is (1) not connected to a 
municipal sewer system or (2) connected to it as a distinct and separately 
managed segment of the system. The act specifies that a “community sewerage 
system” does not include a system serving only a principal dwelling and ADU 
located on the same lot. 
The act does not prevent municipalities from prohibiting or limiting the use of 
ADUs for short-term rentals or vacation stays. 
 
Housing Stock Calculation Under CGS § 8-30g 
 
The Department of Housing (DOH) annually promulgates a list identifying the 
housing stock in each municipality that qualifies as affordable housing under the  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 5 of 14  
Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure (see BACKGROUND).  The 
list, based on U.S. Census data, provides this information as a percentage of the 
total housing stock in the municipality (see CGS §§ 8-30g(k) & 8-
37qqq(a)(2)(D)). The act specifies that ADUs built or permitted after January 1, 
2022, but that are not subject to deed restrictions that qualify them as affordable 
housing will not increase a municipality’s base (market-rate) housing stock 
calculation. Therefore, as of right ADUs will not increase the amount of 
affordable housing that a municipality must have to obtain or maintain an 
exemption or moratorium from the procedure.  
The act also aligns the definition of “accessory apartment” under the appeals 
procedure with the act’s definition of ADU.   
EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 1, 2022, for the main ADU provisions (§ 6) and 
October 1, 2021, for the definitions and conforming changes (§§ 1, 7 & 10). 
 
§ 2 — APPLICATION AND TECHNICAL CONSULTANT FEE S 
 
Limits municipal authority to charge disproportionality higher land use application fees for larger 
residential projects; authorizes municipalities to charge technical consultant fees  
 
Existing law allows municipalities, by ordinance, to set reasonable fees for 
processing applications submitted to the planning, zoning, or planning and zoning 
commission; the zoning board of appeals; or inland wetlands commission. The act 
prohibits adopting a fee schedule that imposes higher fees on developments built 
following an appeal brought under the Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals 
Procedure (CGS § 8-30g). It also prohibits using a fee schedule charging more 
because a residential building has more than four units, including higher fees per 
unit, per square footage, or per unit of construction cost.   
The act additionally allows municipalities to adopt regulations establishing 
reasonable technical consultant fees for applications made to the abovementioned 
boards and commissions. The fees must be used to pay consultants who have 
expertise in land use to review particular technical aspects of an application (e.g., 
traffic or stormwater) for the benefit of the commission or board. 
The fees must be accounted for separately and may only be used for technical 
review costs. The fees cannot be used to pay a consultant who is a salaried 
employee of the municipality, commission, or board. Leftover amounts, including 
any interest accrued, must be returned to the applicant within 45 days after the 
review is complete.   
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§§ 3 & 4 — CGS § 8-2: REORGANIZATION AND MINOR CHANGES  
 
Reorganizes the Zoning Enabling Act (CGS § 8-2, which applies to municipalities exercising 
zoning powers under the statutes) and makes minor, technical, and conforming changes 
 
The act makes various minor, technical, and conforming changes to the 
Zoning Enabling Act, which applies to municipalities that exercise zoning powers 
under the statutes (as opposed to a special act).    O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 6 of 14  
Among these, the act specifies that when a municipality is contiguous to, or 
on a navigable waterway that drains to, Long Island Sound, its regulations must 
require the zoning commission to consider a proposed development’s 
environmental impact on Long Island Sound’s coastal resources, rather than 
impacts on Long Island Sound generally. By law, “coastal resources” means 
coastal waters and their natural resources, related marine and wildlife habitat, and 
adjacent shorelands (CGS § 22a-93).  
The act specifically authorizes municipalities to use a vehicle’s estimated 
miles traveled and vehicle trips generated standard instead of, or in addition to, a 
“level of service” traffic calculation when assessing (1) a proposed development’s 
anticipated traffic impact and (2) potential mitigation strategies such as reducing 
the amount of required parking for a development or requiring public sidewalks, 
crosswalks, bicycle paths, bicycle racks, or bus shelters (including off-site). 
The act specifies that regulations may provide for floating zones, overlay 
zones, and planned development districts. (Connecticut courts have held that CGS 
§ 8-2 implicitly grants municipalities the power to use these techniques.) 
The act also makes technical and conforming changes to the temporary health 
care structure law (§ 3). 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: REQUIRED GOALS AND CONSIDERATIONS  
 
Eliminates a requirement that zoning regulations be (1) designed to prevent overcrowding and 
undue population concentration and (2) made with reasonable consideration as to the 
“character” of a district; requires that regulations provide for varied housing opportunities and 
affirmatively further the purposes of the federal Fair Housing Act; requires regulations to be 
designed to protect historic, tribal, cultural, and environmental resources  
 
Required Goals 
 
The act eliminates the requirement that zoning regulations be designed to 
prevent the overcrowding of land and avoid undue concentration of population. 
The act requires that regulations be designed to do the following: 
1. protect the state’s historic, tribal, cultural, and environmental resources; 
2. consider the impact of permitted land uses on contiguous municipalities 
and the planning region;  
3. address significant disparities in housing needs and access to educational, 
occupational, and other opportunities;  
4. affirmatively further the purposes of the federal Fair Housing Act; and 
5. promote efficient review of proposals and applications. 
 
Consideration of Character  
 
Prior law required that zoning regulations be made with (1) reasonable 
consideration as to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for 
particular uses and (2) a view toward conserving the buildings’ value and 
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout a municipality. The act  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 7 of 14  
eliminates the broad requirement that regulations consider character and preserve 
property values.  Instead, it requires consideration of a district’s physical site 
characteristics and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view toward 
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout a municipality. 
The act also specifies that regulations cannot be applied to deny a land use 
application (including site plans, special permits or exceptions, or other zoning 
approval) based upon: 
1. a district’s character unless the character is expressly articulated in 
regulations with clear and explicit physical standards for site work and 
structures or  
2. the immutable characteristics, income source, or income level of an 
applicant or end user (other than age or disability, in the case of age-
restricted or disability-restricted housing). 
 
Providing Housing Opportunities  
 
In addition to the housing-related provisions above, the act requires zoning 
regulations to provide for, rather than encourage, the development of housing 
opportunities for all residents of the municipality and local planning region. This 
includes opportunities for multifamily dwellings consistent with soil types, 
terrain, and infrastructure capacity.   
The act requires zoning regulations to expressly allow, rather than encourage, 
housing that meets the needs identified in the state’s Consolidated Plan for 
Housing and Community Development and Plan of Conservation and 
Development. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§§ 4 & 5 — CGS § 8-2: PROHIBITED PROVISIONS  
 
Prohibits regulations from (1) prohibiting cottage food operations in a residential zone; (2) 
placing a cap on the number of dwellings in multifamily, middle, or mixed-use developments; or 
(3) establishing minimum floor area requirements for dwelling units; limits local authority to 
require the provision of parking spaces  
 
The act prohibits zoning regulations from: 
1. prohibiting cottage food operations (i.e., operations in which food 
products are prepared in a private residential dwelling’s home kitchen and 
for sale directly to the consumer) in a residential zone; 
2. establishing minimum floor area requirements for dwelling units that are 
greater than those required under applicable building, housing, or other 
code; or 
3. placing a fixed numerical or percentage cap on the number of dwelling 
units permitted in multifamily housing over four units, middle housing, or 
mixed-use developments.  
Under the act, “middle housing” refers to duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, 
cottage clusters, and townhouses. A “cottage cluster” is a grouping of at least four 
detached housing units or live work units per acre that are located around a  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 8 of 14  
common open area. A “mixed-use development” is a development containing 
residential and nonresidential uses in a single building. A “townhouse” is a 
residential building constructed in a grouping of three or more attached units, 
each of which shares at least one common wall with an adjacent unit and has 
exterior walls on at least two sides.  
The act also prohibits regulations from requiring more than one parking space 
for each studio or one-bedroom dwelling unit or more than two parking spaces for 
each dwelling unit with two or more bedrooms unless the municipality opts out as 
authorized under the act. 
To opt out of the act’s parking provision, the municipality’s zoning or 
combined planning and zoning commission must do the following: 
1. first hold a public hearing on the proposed opt-out, subject to the standard 
notice and timeframes for such hearings; 
2. affirmatively decide by a two-thirds vote to opt out within the statutory 
time limit (generally within 65 days of the hearing’s completion); 
3. state in the record the reasons for its decision; and 
4. publish notice of the decision within 15 days in a newspaper that has 
substantial circulation in the municipality. 
The act requires the opt-out to be confirmed by a two-thirds vote of the 
municipal legislative body (or, if it is a town meeting, the board of selectmen). 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: OPTIONS FOR PROMOTING CONSERVATION  
 
Expands the energy conservation tools and renewable energy types a municipality can promote, 
including explicitly authorizing regulations to require certain conservation measures  
 
Prior law allowed zoning regulations to encourage the use of certain energy 
conservation tools, including solar. The act instead allows the regulations to 
require or promote these and specifically includes distributed generation or 
freestanding wind and combined heat and power.   
The act also expands the conservation tools that municipalities can incentivize 
developers’ use of to include any solar and other renewable forms of energy; 
combined heat and power; water conservation, including demand offsets; and 
other energy conservation techniques. Prior law specifically addressed only 
passive solar techniques.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 4 — CGS § 8-2: REGULATING MOBILE MANUFACTURED HOMES 
 
Specifies how regulations must treat mobile manufactured homes and associated lots  
 
Under prior law, zoning regulations adopted under CGS § 8-2 could not treat 
manufactured homes and lots substantially differently from single-family 
dwellings and lots with those dwellings. Additionally, prior law specified that 
under such regulations, manufactured home developments could not be treated 
substantially differently from multifamily dwellings or associated lots, cluster  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 9 of 14  
developments, or planned unit developments.  
The act instead prohibits regulations from imposing on manufactured homes, 
including mobile homes and associated lots and parks, conditions that are 
substantially different from those imposed on single- or multi-family dwellings 
and associated lots, cluster developments, or planned unit developments. The act 
removes references to manufactured home developments for these purposes. 
As under prior law, these provisions apply to manufactured homes built to 
federal standards and with a narrowest dimension of 22 feet or more. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 8 — ZONING ENFORCEMENT O FFICER CERTIFICATION  
 
Beginning January 1, 2023, requires all appointed ZEOs to obtain and maintain certification from 
the state’s professional ZEO association  
 
Beginning January 1, 2023, and annually thereafter, the act requires zoning 
enforcement officers (ZEOs) working in municipalities that exercise zoning 
authority under the statutes to obtain certification from the Connecticut 
Association of ZEOs. The act requires ZEOs to maintain certification for the 
duration of their employment as ZEOs.  
By law, each municipality decides how its zoning regulations are enforced. In 
practice, the zoning or combined planning and zoning commission may reserve 
the enforcement power to itself, or it may be delegated to a ZEO. ZEOs may be 
responsible for (1) investigating zoning violations and issuing cease and desist 
orders and (2) reviewing and providing an advisory opinion on applications for 
special permits, site plans, subdivisions, and variances. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 9 — BIENNIAL TRAINING FOR CERTAIN LAND USE OFFICIALS 
 
Requires local planning and zoning officials to complete at least four hours of training biennially 
 
Beginning January 1, 2023, the act requires each member of a local planning 
commission, zoning commission, planning and zoning commission, or zoning 
board of appeals to complete at least four hours of training biennially. 
Members serving on a board or commission as of January 1, 2023, must 
complete their initial training by January 1, 2024. Members not serving on 
January 1, 2023, must complete the training within one year after being elected or 
appointed to the board or commission.    
The initial and subsequent training must include at least one hour on 
affordable and fair housing policies. Training may also cover: 
1. process and procedural matters, including the conduct of effective 
meetings and public hearings and the Freedom of Information Act;  
2. the interpretation of site plans, surveys, maps, and architectural 
conventions; and  
3. the impact of zoning on the environment, agriculture, and historic 
resources.  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 10 of 14  
By January 1, 2022, the act requires the Office of Policy and Management 
secretary to establish guidelines for the training in collaboration with land use 
training providers, including the Connecticut Association of Zoning Enforcement 
Officials, the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, the Connecticut Chapter 
of the American Planning Association, the Land Use Academy at UConn’s Center 
for Land Use Education and Research, the Connecticut Bar Association, regional 
councils of governments, and other nonprofit or educational institutions that 
provide land use training. If the secretary fails to establish the guidelines, then 
land use training providers may create and administer appropriate training. 
The act requires each board or commission, starting by March 1, 2024, to 
annually submit to its municipal legislative body (or board of selectmen, if a town 
meeting) a statement affirming its members’ compliance with the act’s training 
requirement.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage 
 
§ 11 — WATER POLLUTION CONT ROL PLANS 
 
Allows WPCAs to add information about sewer system capacity for certain areas to municipal 
water pollution control plans  
 
By law, water pollution control plans created by municipal water pollution 
control authorities (WPCAs) delineate areas such as those (1) served by the 
municipal sewerage system, (2) where sewerage facilities are planned, and (3) 
where sewers should be avoided. The plans also describe municipal programs to 
avoid pollution problems and manage subsurface sewage disposal. 
The act allows WPCAs to delineate in these plans the specific capacity 
allocations to serve developable areas for residential or mixed-use buildings with 
at least four dwelling units.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
 
§ 12 — AFFORDABLE HOUSING P LANNING REQUIREMENT 
 
Specifies that municipalities must prepare and adopt their first plans by June 1, 2022; requires 
plans to be submitted to OPM 
 
Existing law requires every municipality, at least once every five years, to 
prepare or amend and adopt an affordable housing plan specifying how the 
municipality will increase the number of affordable housing developments in its 
jurisdiction. The act specifies that municipalities must prepare and adopt their first 
plans by June 1, 2022. The act also requires municipalities to post their draft plan 
or updates online.  Under prior law, this was only required if they held a public 
hearing on the draft plan or updates. (As under prior law, if they hold a hearing, 
they must post the draft plan online at least 35 days beforehand.) It eliminates a 
requirement that the draft plan or amendment be filed with the town clerk. 
The act requires municipalities to submit their plans to OPM for posting on its 
website. Under prior law, if a municipality did not comply with plan amendment 
deadlines, it had to submit a letter to the housing commissioner explaining why.  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 11 of 14  
The act instead requires them to submit the letter to OPM and, in providing this 
explanation, specify a date by which the plan will be amended.    
The act also authorizes municipalities to submit their affordable housing plans 
as part of their local plan of conservation and development (POCD). Those doing 
so may submit their affordable housing plan early to coincide with a POCD 
submission, so long as their next submission is five years later. (POCDs are due 
every 10 years.) 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage 
 
§ 13 — COMMISSION ON CONN ECTICUT’S DEVELOPMEN T AND 
FUTURE 
 
Establishes a commission within the Legislative Department to evaluate policies related to land 
use, conservation, housing affordability, and infrastructure 
 
The act establishes a Commission on Connecticut’s Development and Future 
within the Legislative Department to evaluate policies related to land use, 
conservation, housing affordability, and infrastructure.  
The act specifies that the commission may accept administrative support and 
technical and research assistance from employees of the Joint Committee on 
Legislative Management and outside organizations. The co-chairpersons may 
establish working groups consisting of commission members and nonmembers 
and may designate a chairperson of each working group.  
 
Membership 
 
The commission consists of the following members: 
1. two appointed by the House speaker, one who is a legislator and one who  
represents a municipal advocacy organization; 
2. two appointed by the Senate president pro tempore, one who is a legislator 
and one who has expertise in state or local planning; 
3. two appointed by the House majority leader, one who has expertise in 
state affordable housing policy and one who represents a town with a 
population over 30,000 but less than 75,000; 
4. two appointed by the Senate majority leader, one who has expertise in 
zoning policy and one with expertise in community development policy; 
5. two appointed by the House minority leader, one who has expertise in 
environmental policy and one who represents a municipal advocacy 
organization; 
6. two appointed by the Senate minority leader, one who represents the 
Connecticut Association of Councils of Governments and one with 
expertise in homebuilding; 
7. two appointed by the governor, one who is an attorney with expertise in 
planning and zoning and one who has expertise in fair housing; 
8. the chairs and ranking members of the Planning and Development, 
Environment, Housing, and Transportation committees; 
9. the administrative services, economic and community development,  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 12 of 14  
energy and environmental protection, housing, and transportation 
commissioners, or their designees; and 
10. the OPM secretary.  
The House speaker and Senate president pro tempore cannot appoint as their 
legislative appointees a chair or ranking member of the Planning and 
Development, Environment, Housing, or Transportation committee. The act 
requires appointing authorities, in cooperation with one another, to make a good 
faith effort to ensure that, to the extent possible, the commission’s membership 
closely reflects Connecticut’s gender and racial diversity.  
Members serve without compensation, except for necessary expenses incurred 
in the performance of their duties. Appointing authorities must fill any vacancy. 
The House speaker and Senate president pro tempore must jointly select one 
of their legislative appointments to serve as one of the chairpersons. The OPM 
secretary serves as the other chairperson. The chairpersons are responsible for 
scheduling the first commission meeting. 
 
Responsibilities  
 
By January 1, 2022, and again by January 1, 2023, the commission must 
submit a report to the Planning and Development, Environment, Housing, and 
Transportation committees and to the OPM secretary regarding the following: 
1. any recommendations for statutory changes to the process for developing, 
adopting, and implementing the state plan of conservation and 
development;  
2. any recommendations for (a) statutory changes to the process for 
developing and adopting the state’s consolidated plan for housing and 
community development and (b) implementing it;  
3. any recommendations for guidelines and incentives for compliance with 
the law’s (a) affordable housing planning requirement (see above, § 12) 
and (b) requirements under the Zoning Enabling Act that zoning 
regulations provide opportunities for developing varied housing 
opportunities, promote housing choice and economic diversity in housing, 
and expressly allow for housing to be developed that meets the needs 
identified in the state’s consolidated plan for housing and community 
development and plan of conservation and development; 
4. any recommendations as to how such compliance should be determined, 
as well as the form and manner in which evidence of such compliance 
should be demonstrated;  
5. (a) existing categories of discharge that constitute alternative on-site 
sewage treatment systems, subsurface community sewerage systems, and 
decentralized systems; (b) current administrative jurisdiction to issue or 
deny permits and approvals for these systems (with reference to these 
systems’ daily capacities); and (c) the potential impacts of increasing their 
daily capacities, including changes in administrative jurisdiction over 
these systems and the timeframe for adopting regulations to implement 
these changes; and   O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 13 of 14  
6. development of (a) model design guidelines for both buildings and 
context-appropriate streets that municipalities may adopt, in whole or in 
part, as part of their zoning or subdivision regulations as described below 
and (b)implementation by the regional councils of governments of an 
education and training program for delivering the model design guidelines. 
Under the act, the report on model design guidelines must provide guidelines 
that: 
1. identify common architectural and site design features of building types 
used throughout Connecticut;  
2. create a catalogue of common building types, particularly those typically 
associated with housing;   
3. establish reasonable and cost-effective design review standards for 
approval of common building types, accounting for topography, geology, 
climate change, and infrastructure capacity;  
4. establish procedures for expediting the approval of buildings or streets that 
satisfy these design review standards, whether for zoning or subdivision 
regulations; and   
5. create a design manual for context-appropriate streets that complements 
common building types. 
The act specifies that the provision requiring the commission to provide 
recommendations related to compliance with the state’s affordable housing 
planning requirement should not be construed to change municipalities’ 
obligation to adopt or amend their plans on-time. 
If the commission is unable to meet the first reporting deadline (January 1, 
2022), the co-chairpersons must request an extension from the House speaker and 
Senate president pro tempore and must submit an interim report.  The commission 
terminates when it submits its final report or January 1, 2023, whichever is later.   
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage 
 
BACKGROUND 
 
Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure (CGS § 8-30g) 
 
The procedure requires municipal planning and zoning agencies 
(“municipalities”) to defend their decisions to reject affordable housing 
development applications or approve them with costly conditions. In traditional 
land use appeals, the developer must convince the court that the municipality 
acted illegally, arbitrarily, or abused its discretion. The procedure instead places 
the burden of proof on municipalities. 
With limited exceptions, developers can use the appeals procedure to contest a 
municipality’s decision on an affordable housing development application 
submitted to a municipality if (1) fewer than 10% of the municipality’s housing 
units are affordable, based on certain statutory criteria, and (2) the municipality 
has not qualified for a moratorium (i.e., a temporary suspension of procedure 
following a relatively rapid increase in affordable housing stock). 
By law, DOH annually publishes a list of housing stock in each municipality  O L R P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 	Page 14 of 14  
that qualifies as affordable housing.