Connecticut House Bill HB06155

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/21
• Refer: 1/29/21

Caption

An Act Requiring Internet Service Providers That Are State Contractors To Adopt A Net Neutrality Policy.

Impact

The proposed legislation is expected to impact state laws by reinforcing the principles of net neutrality at the contractual level with state contractors. By requiring ISPs to adhere to specific guidelines, the bill seeks to establish a level playing field for internet access, ensuring that users can access the content and services of their choice without discrimination. This is particularly significant in an era where discussions about the fairness and openness of the internet are increasingly prevalent, potentially benefiting consumers and small businesses alike who often face challenges in navigating an uneven digital landscape.

Summary

House Bill 06155 aims to impose net neutrality requirements on internet service providers (ISPs) that enter into contracts with the state. The bill mandates these providers to adopt a net neutrality policy that prohibits practices such as blocking lawful content, impairing lawful internet traffic, and engaging in paid prioritization. Additionally, the ISPs must disclose their network management practices and performance, ensuring consumers are adequately informed about the services they provide. This legislation directly addresses issues surrounding internet accessibility and the fairness of online service distribution, particularly for consumers relying on state-contracted ISPs.

Contention

While proponents of HB 06155 argue that it is a necessary step toward protecting consumers from potential abuses by ISPs, critics may express concerns regarding the potential regulatory burdens on service providers. Discussions could also highlight the balance between encouraging investment in broadband infrastructure and maintaining consumer protections. As the debate around net neutrality continues to evolve, this bill represents a critical point of contention in the ongoing dialogue about internet regulation, particularly given the political and economic implications surrounding it.