Connecticut House Bill HB06508

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/21
• Refer: 2/24/21
• Report Pass: 3/11/21
• Refer: 3/22/21
• Report Pass: 3/29/21

Caption

An Act Concerning Remote Learning Attendance.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6508 is expected to modify existing state laws concerning school attendance and instructional hours for K-12 education. Specifically, it revises the definition of 'actual school session' to include remote learning, ensuring that these virtual sessions count towards the required school days and hours mandated by state regulations. This change addresses concerns about student attendance during remote learning days and aims to reduce ambiguity in how absences are categorized for students participating in online education.

Summary

House Bill 6508, also known as 'An Act Concerning Remote Learning Attendance', was introduced to formalize the inclusion of remote learning as a legitimate mode of instruction for high school students in grades nine through twelve. The bill allows local and regional boards of education in Connecticut to authorize remote learning models and specify attendance requirements. This legislative move is seen as a response to the increasing need for flexible education options, particularly in light of recent shifts towards online platforms due to the pandemic.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 6508 appears supportive, especially among educators and parents who favor increased educational flexibility. Proponents argue that the bill represents a progressive move towards modernizing education delivery, while also accommodating the diverse needs of students. However, there are concerns raised by some stakeholders about the potential implications for student engagement and the quality of education when remote learning becomes more standardized compared to traditional in-person classes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the effectiveness of remote learning as a substitute for in-person education, particularly regarding student achievement and social interaction. Critics express concern that while remote learning provides flexibility, it may not equally benefit all students, particularly those lacking adequate technology or home support. Furthermore, the requirement for local boards to define attendance parameters raises questions about how absences will be monitored, and whether such definitions will mitigate truancy issues effectively.