Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06531 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 05/26/2021

                     
Researcher: JSB 	Page 1 	5/26/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6531 (File 685, as amended by House "A" and Senate "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN EVICTION 
PROCEEDINGS, THE VALIDITY OF INLAND WETLANDS PERMITS 
IN RELATION TO CERTAIN OTHER LAND USE APPROVALS, AND 
EXTENDING THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE 
PERMITS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes unrelated changes regarding (1) certain individuals’ 
right to counsel in eviction proceedings and (2) local land use 
approvals.  
The bill establishes a statewide “right to counsel program” to 
provide free legal representation to income-eligible tenants, lessees, or 
occupants of any residential building or land (i.e., “covered 
individuals”) in a covered matter initiated on or after July 1, 2021. 
Under the bill, a “covered matter” is an eviction proceeding or 
administrative proceeding necessary to preserve a state or federal 
housing subsidy or prevent a proposed lease termination. 
It requires the judicial branch to use available federal funds to either 
contract with, or enter a memorandum of agreement with, an entity to 
administer the program (i.e., “administering entity”). It also establishes 
an 11-member working group to advise on matters and policies 
affecting the right to counsel program. 
The bill requires the administering entity, within available funding, 
to fund the provision of legal representation under the program by 
designated organizations (i.e., nonprofit legal services organizations). 
Additionally, it requires the administering entity to (1) determine, in 
consultation with the working group and designated organizations, 
how to phase in the program based on certain relevant factors and (2) 
starting by January 1, 2023, annually report to the Housing Committee 
and Judicial Department on the number of individuals represented  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 2 	5/26/21 
 
under the program, the extent of the representation, case outcomes, 
and tenant engagement and education.  
It also requires the judicial branch to (1) in consultation with the 
administering entity, working group, and designated organizations, 
approve a one-page, plain-language notice for landlords and certain 
others, starting October 1, 2021, to inform individuals of their rights 
under the program and (2) make the notice available publicly and on 
its website by that date.  
The bill also specifies that it does not establish any right enforceable 
by a covered individual against a designated organization or the 
administering entity. 
Regarding local land use approvals, the bill generally delays the 
effective date of municipal inland wetlands permits to coincide with 
the effective period of related local land use approvals (e.g., special 
permits, zoning variances, site plans, and subdivision plans) (§ 2). The 
bill also gives developers more time to complete certain ongoing 
projects without seeking reapproval from local land use boards, 
commissions, or agencies. It applies only to approvals and permits that 
were (1) granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the bill’s passage 
and (2) unexpired on March 10, 2020 (§§ 501-507). 
*House Amendment “A” (1) changes the effective date of the right 
to counsel program to July 1, 2021, and specifies that the program 
applies to covered matters initiated on or after that date; (2) requires 
the judicial branch to procure the program’s administering entity, 
instead of requiring that a private organization be the entity; (3) 
replaces the 15-member advisory council in the underlying bill with an 
11-member working group to advise on the program; (4) eliminates a 
provision that makes people eligible for the program if they are unable 
to timely secure legal representation due to certain factors; (5) requires 
the judicial branch, instead of the administering entity, to develop the  
plain language notice; (6) eliminates the requirement for designated 
organizations to incorporate certain paralegals, legal interns, or law 
students to provide services; (7) eliminates the administering entity’s  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 3 	5/26/21 
 
express authorization to use the funds it receives to pay the cost of 
attorney training; (8) allows the judicial branch to use the state and 
federal funds it receives under the bill to appoint additional housing 
mediators; (9) adds the provisions concerning local land use approvals; 
and (10) makes other minor changes. 
*Senate Amendment “A” (1) eliminates the provisions added by 
House Amendment “A” about extended land use approval deadlines 
for projects approved before July 1, 2011, and adds the provisions 
about projects approved on or after that date and (2) makes the 
following changes to the right to counsel program: (a) extends, from 
July 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, the date by which the judicial branch 
must make the plain-language notice available publicly and on its 
website and when landlords and other entities must start distributing 
it; (b) requires the judicial branch to hire additional housing mediators 
to facilitate summary process actions if the branch receives funding 
under the bill for that purpose; and (c) makes other minor changes.    
EFFECTIVE DATE:  July 1, 2021, except the concurrent wetlands 
permit provision (§ 2) is applicable to permits issued on or after July 1, 
2021, and the extended land use approval provisions are effective 
upon passage (§§ 501-507). 
RIGHT TO COUNSEL PRO GRAM 
Program Eligibility 
Under the bill, the right to counsel program is available to income-
eligible residential tenants, lessees, or occupants who are parties in an 
eviction or certain administrative proceedings as described above. The 
bill specifies that it applies to any residential land or building, 
apartment, or dwelling unit, including trailers or mobile manufactured 
homes and associated lots.  
Under the bill, an individual is “income-eligible” if he or she:  
1. has household income at or below 80% of the state median 
income adjusted for family size, as determined by the U.S. 
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), at the  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 4 	5/26/21 
 
time of the request for representation or  
2. receives one of the following types of public assistance: 
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental 
Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, Medicaid, Supplemental 
Security Income, refugee resettlement benefits, state rental 
assistance, or federal Housing Choice Voucher Program 
assistance.  
Designated Organization’s Minimum Standards 
The administering entity, within available funding, must fund the 
provision of legal representation under the program by designated 
organizations. Under the bill “legal representation” means (1) 
representation in a covered matter provided by a designated 
organization to a covered individual and (2) all legal advice, advocacy, 
and assistance associated with the representation, subject to and in 
accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct.   
A designated organization is a nonprofit legal services organization 
that must:  
1. have substantial expertise in (a) housing and landlord tenant 
law and (b) furnishing free legal assistance to eligible 
individuals,  
2. have a demonstrated history of serving the low-income 
community,  
3. identify the geographic area in which the organization provides 
legal representation,  
4. have a plan to reach and provide legal representation to 
income-eligible individuals with limited English proficiency, 
and 
5. provide appropriate supervision and training. 
A designated organization may subcontract with a nonprofit or 
community organization to provide legal representation and tenant  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 5 	5/26/21 
 
outreach and education under the program.  
Working Group 
The bill establishes an 11-member working group to advise on 
matters and policies affecting the right to counsel program to 
effectuate the right to counsel.  
Members and Appointments. The working group consists of the 
following members:  
1. two each appointed by the Senate president and the House 
speaker; 
2. one each appointed by the Senate and House majority and 
minority leaders; 
3. the housing commissioner, or her designee;  
4. a representative of the administering entity; and 
5. a judicial branch representative. 
 All initial appointments must be made by July 31, 2021. Members 
serve a four-year term and may be reappointed or continue to serve 
until a successor is appointed. Appointing authorities fill vacancies.  
Meetings and Staff. The housing commissioner, or her designee, 
must serve as the working group’s chairperson and schedule the first 
meeting, which must be held within 60 days after the bill’s effective 
date. The chairperson must convene the working group on a regular 
basis but not less than three times per year.  
The Department of Housing must provide administrative support to 
the working group. 
Relevant Factors to Phase in the Program 
The bill requires the administering entity, in consultation with the 
working group and designated organizations, to determine how to 
phase in the program based on all relevant factors, including the:  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 6 	5/26/21 
 
1. prioritization of certain groups of individuals by income, zip 
codes, census tracts, or other priority criteria they develop; 
2. availability of program funding;  
3. number of available trained legal services attorneys; and  
4. scope of the need for legal representation. 
Funding 
The bill allows the administering entity to receive funds or services 
from the government, corporations, associations, or individuals to 
fund program administration, the provision of legal representation, 
and tenant outreach and education.  
Under the bill, the judicial branch must appoint additional housing 
mediators to facilitate the resolution of summary process actions, if the 
branch receives state or federal funds under the bill for that purpose. 
Under existing law, Superior Court judges or a committee they 
authorize may appoint housing mediators as they deem necessary, 
within available appropriations (CGS § 47a-69). 
PLAIN-LANGUAGE NOTICE OF T ENANTS’ RIGHTS 
The bill requires the judicial branch, in consultation with the 
administering entity, working group, and designated organizations, to 
approve a one-page, plain-language notice to inform tenants of their 
rights under the program. The notice must (1) include a phone number 
for information and applying for assistance and (2) by October 1, 2021, 
be on the judicial branch’s website and publicly available. 
Starting October 1, 2021, the bill requires an owner, lessor, or 
landlord; their agent or legal representative; a housing authority; or a 
housing subsidy program administrator, as applicable, to attach a copy 
of the plain-language notice to a (1) notice to quit delivered to a 
covered individual pursuant to an eviction proceeding, (2) summons 
and complaint for a summary process eviction action, (3) lease 
termination notice for a public or subsidized housing unit, and (4) 
notice to terminate a state or federal housing subsidy.  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 7 	5/26/21 
 
Under the bill, the court must include similar plain language 
information in any notice scheduling a mediation or hearing that is 
sent to a self-represented party in an eviction proceeding. 
EFFECTIVE DATE OF INLAND WETLANDS PERMIT S (§ 2) 
The bill delays the effective date of municipal inland wetlands 
permits to coincide with the effective period of related local land use 
approvals. Under the bill, if the inland wetlands permit is just one of 
the local land use approvals required to develop a property, the 
wetlands permit does not take effect until the other local approvals are 
effective.   
Inland wetlands permits are generally valid for the same length of 
time as the other land use approvals issued for the development, up to 
a maximum of 10 years. 
SPECIAL PERMIT OR EX CEPTION PROJECT COMP LETION 
DEADLINES (§§ 505-507) 
The bill establishes a minimum validity period for special permit or 
exception approvals (1) granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the 
bill’s passage; (2) that were unexpired on March 10, 2020; and (3) that 
specified a deadline by which all work in connection with the approval 
must be completed. Under the bill, these approvals are valid for a 
minimum of 19 years after the approval is granted. Existing statutes do 
not impose any minimum validity periods for these approvals (see 
BACKGROUND) .   
The bill specifies that (1) the applicable land use board, commission, 
or agency may extend these approvals beyond 19 years and (2) this 
minimum 19-year validity period applies to special permits or 
exceptions approved by a municipality exercising land use powers 
under the statutes or a special act. 
OTHER PROJECT COMPLETION D EADLINES  
Municipalities Exercising Authority Under the Statutes (§§ 501-
504) 
When a planning or zoning commission, combined planning and 
zoning commission, or an inland wetlands agency operating under the  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 8 	5/26/21 
 
statutes approves a project, it must set an expiration date that falls 
within the timeframes the law specifies. Consequently, a developer 
must complete the project before that date or resubmit it to the local 
commission or agency for approval. Generally, under current law, the 
maximum timeframe (including any extensions granted) is 10 years 
from the date of approval. The bill extends these timeframes for 
approvals (1) granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the bill’s 
passage, and (2) that were unexpired on March 10, 2020. Under the bill, 
except for large residential subdivisions, the initial deadline must be at 
least 14 years after approval, and the extended deadline cannot be 
more than 19 years after approval. Large residential subdivision 
approvals are valid for 19 years. 
Table 1, below, shows the current and extended deadlines that 
apply to subdivision, wetlands, and site plans approvals granted by 
municipalities operating under the statutes.  
Table 1: Statutory Deadlines and Extensions Under Current Law and the Bill 
Land Use Approval 
(CGS §) 
Current Law 	Bill 
Residential site plans for projects 
with 400 or more units 
(§ 8-3(j)) 
Deadline: 10 years after approval  No change 
No extensions 
Business site plans for projects 
with at least 400,000 square feet 
(§ 8-3(j)) 
Deadline: 5-10 years after approval 
(set locally) 
No change 
Extension: up to 10 years from 
approval 
Other site plans 
(§ 8-3(i)) 
Deadline: 5 years after approval  At least 14 
years after 
approval 
Extension: up to 10 years from 
approval 
Up to 19 years 
from approval 
Subdivisions plans for 400 or 
more dwelling units 
(§ 8-26g) 
Deadline: 10 years after approval  19 years after 
approval 
No extensions 	No change  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 9 	5/26/21 
 
Other subdivisions 
(§ 8-26c(a)&(b)) 
Deadline: 5 years after approval  At least 14 
years after 
approval 
Extension: up to 10 years from 
approval 
Up to 19 years 
from approval 
Wetlands permits associated 
with another approval (e.g., site 
plans and subdivisions) 
(§ 22a-42a(d)(2)) 
Deadline: 10 years after approval or 
the date the associated land use 
approval expires (whichever is 
earlier) 
At least 14 
years from 
approval  
Extension: up to 10 years from 
approval 
Up to 19 years 
from approval 
Other wetlands 
(§ 22a-42a(d)(2)) 
Deadline: 2-5 years after approval 
(set locally) 
At least 14 
years after 
approval 
Extension: up to 10 years from 
approval 
Up to 19 years 
from approval 
 
Municipalities Exercising Authority Under a Special Act (§ 507) 
The bill sets a minimum approval duration of 14 years for site plan 
and subdivision approvals and other permits (except special permits 
or exceptions, see above) granted by a zoning commission, planning 
commission, combined planning and zoning commission, zoning 
board of appeals, or inland wetlands agency exercising land use 
powers under a special act. The bill applies only to approvals (1) 
granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the bill’s passage, and (2) 
that were unexpired on March 10, 2020. 
The bill specifies that local boards or agencies may approve 
extensions, but caps the total duration of an approval, including 
extensions, at 19 years (except special permits or exceptions, see 
above). The 14- and 19-year timeframes are calculated based on the 
initial approval date and apply regardless of conflicting special acts or 
approval conditions. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Executive Order 
Under EO 7JJ, the expiration date of various land use approvals is 
tolled during the declared emergencies (§ 3, issued on May 6, 2020, 
and subsequently extended through June 30, 2021). The tolling  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 10 	5/26/21 
 
provision applies only if the approval-holder was not in violation of 
the approval’s conditions on March 10, 2020, and did not violate them 
during the declared emergencies. (A waiver of this requirement is 
available.) 
Related Bills 
SB 970 (File 685), as amended by Senate Amendment “A,” contains 
identical provisions that give developers more time to complete an 
ongoing project that was approved on or after July 1, 2011, but before 
the bill’s passage. 
sSB 6541 (File 304), favorably reported by the Planning and 
Development Committee, is identical to the provision about the 
effective date of inland wetlands permits.  
Special Permits and Exceptions and Related Caselaw 
“Special permit” and “special exception” are synonymous. The 
designated local land use agency may grant special permits or 
exceptions pursuant to the Zoning Enabling Act (CGS § 8-2) or a 
special act, as applicable. Special permits and exceptions allow one to 
use a property in a manner explicitly permitted by the zoning 
regulations but subject to conditions not applicable to other uses in the 
same district. The rationale for special permits and exceptions is that 
while certain land uses may be generally compatible with the uses 
permitted as of right in a particular zoning district, their nature is such 
that their precise location and mode of operation must be individually 
regulated. 
In February 2021, the Connecticut Appellate Court issued a decision 
applicable to municipalities that exercise zoning powers under the 
statutes. It held that the law authorizes these municipalities to impose 
temporal conditions on special permits or exceptions, such as a 
condition requiring development to be completed by a specific date 
(International Investors v. Fairfield Planning & Zoning Commission, 202 
Conn. App. 582, cert. granted, 336 Conn. 928 (March 30, 2021)).   
COMMITTEE ACTION  2021HB-06531-R02-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: JSB 	Page 11 	5/26/21 
 
Housing Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 10 Nay 5 (03/11/2021)