Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06568

Introduced
3/3/21  
Introduced
3/3/21  
Refer
3/3/21  
Report Pass
3/26/21  
Refer
4/9/21  
Report Pass
4/15/21  
Engrossed
5/26/21  
Engrossed
5/26/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Peer-to-peer Car Sharing.

Impact

The legislation impacts state laws by formalizing the liability structure associated with peer-to-peer car sharing, especially in terms of how insurance coverage is managed. It mandates that peer-to-peer car sharing programs assume liability for bodily injury and property damage during the car sharing period, thereby enhancing the protection of third parties involved in transactions. This clarity is expected to encourage the use of peer-to-peer services, making it safer for individuals to share their vehicles, while also delineating the responsibilities of car sharing platforms, vehicle owners, and drivers.

Summary

House Bill 06568, concerning peer-to-peer car sharing, was designed to regulate the emerging market of vehicle sharing through online platforms. It establishes a legal framework for peer-to-peer car sharing programs, defining the roles of shared vehicle owners and drivers, and stipulates requirements around insurance coverage during car sharing periods. The initiative is aimed at promoting growth in the car sharing economy while ensuring adequate consumer protections and liability management for all parties involved in car sharing transactions.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 06568 has been largely positive, reflecting the growing acceptance and enthusiasm for car sharing solutions as a viable transportation alternative. Advocates argue that the bill supports innovation and consumer choice by legitimizing peer-to-peer car sharing, enhancing safety and reliability for users. However, some concerns were raised about the adequacy of insurance coverage and the potential for disputes regarding liability, which indicates a degree of caution among stakeholders in the insurance and legal industries.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 06568 included the balance of liability among shared vehicle owners, drivers, and peer-to-peer platforms. Critics expressed concerns that the bill might lead to unresolved liability disputes, especially in the event of accidents. Moreover, the bill also mandates that shared vehicles not be made available under safety recalls until repairs have been addressed, drawing attention to vehicle safety issues and the responsibilities of shared vehicle owners to ensure compliance with safety regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05389

An Act Concerning A Study To Use Captive Insurance Companies To Reduce Premium Rate Increases For Connecticut Partnership Long-term Care Insurance Policies And Peer-to-peer Car Sharing.

CT HB05384

An Act Concerning Peer-to-peer Car Sharing Programs.

MS HB1048

Peer-to-peer Car Sharing Program Act; create.

LA HB287

Authorizes certain out-of-state insurance companies to apply respective state laws to claims of Louisiana residents

NJ A1742

"Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing Act".

LA HB463

Authorizes the establishment of automobile rental tax districts in certain parishes and dedicates the monies generated from the tax (OR INCREASE LF RV See Note)

LA SB351

Authorizes the parishes of Calcasieu, Jefferson, and Orleans to establish an automobile rental tax district and to levy an automobile rental tax not to exceed three percent beginning July 1, 2012. (gov sig) (RE2 +$3,800,000 LF RV See Note)

LA HB476

Levies a state tax on automobile rental contracts and dedicates the revenues (OR +$6,000,000 SD RV See Note)