Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06589

Introduced
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Refer
4/1/21  
Refer
4/1/21  
Report Pass
4/8/21  
Report Pass
4/8/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Report Pass
6/6/21  
Report Pass
6/6/21  
Passed
6/9/21  
Chaptered
6/28/21  
Chaptered
6/28/21  
Enrolled
6/30/21  
Enrolled
6/30/21  
Passed
7/13/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Third-party Access To Participating Dental Provider Contracts.

Impact

The legislation is expected to impact state laws governing dental health insurance by placing stricter controls on how third-party entities interact with participating dental providers. Health carriers—entities that provide healthcare coverage—would need to ensure that their contracts clearly define the parameters for any third-party access. The requirements for disclosure and maintenance of records are expected to increase compliance burdens on health carriers, which may affect operational costs.

Summary

House Bill 6589 seeks to regulate third-party access to contracts between health carriers and participating dental providers. The bill stipulates that beginning January 1, 2022, no dental provider contract may allow a third party to gain access to it without the explicit consent of participating dental providers. This measure aims to protect the rights of dental providers, ensuring that they are not compelled to work with third parties they do not wish to engage with. It places a significant emphasis on transparency and autonomy for dental providers in their contractual relationships.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 6589 appears cautious, with supporters lauding it as a necessary safeguard for dental providers, facilitating an environment where they can negotiate terms that protect their professional interests. However, there are concerns from some within the health insurance sector that the regulations may complicate relationships between insurers and providers, potentially limiting the options available for patients seeking dental care. The robust debate reflects differing priorities regarding provider autonomy versus accessibility of dental services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential increase in operational costs for health carriers due to enhanced disclosure requirements and the implications of restricting providers from working with third parties. Proponents argue that it will help maintain provider autonomy and improve patient experiences by allowing providers to manage their patient relationships without external pressures. Conversely, opponents highlight that restricting third-party access may limit competitive pricing and discounts available to consumers and could impact the overall efficiency of dental care delivery.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4922

Health: other; surprise medical billing; modify to include certain emergency medical services operations and personnel. Amends secs. 24502, 24503, 24504, 24507, 24509, 24510, 24511 & 24513 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.24502 et seq.).

LA SB516

Provides for direct primary care. (8/1/14)

SD SB87

Address preauthorization requirements for certain health care services and utilization review requirements for certain health benefit plans.

CT SB00433

An Act Concerning Standards And Requirements For Health Carriers' Provider Networks And Contracts Between Health Carriers And Participating Providers.

SD SB158

Address preauthorization requirements for certain health care services and utilization review requirements for certain health benefit plans.

VA HB360

Health insurance; carrier contracts, carrier provision of certain prescription drug information.

VA SB735

Health insurance; denial of referral by direct primary care provider prohibited.

VA SB735

Health insurance; denial of referral by direct primary care provider prohibited.