Connecticut House Bill HB06609

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/21
• Refer: 3/10/21
• Report Pass: 3/31/21
• Refer: 4/13/21
• Report Pass: 4/20/21

Caption

An Act Concerning The Failure To File For A Certain Grand List Exemption.

Impact

The implementation of HB 06609 primarily affects property tax regulations in Danbury. By allowing late submissions of exemption filings to be recognized, the bill seeks to alleviate the financial burden on property owners who may have encountered difficulties or oversights. The bill requires affected persons to pay any late fees applicable as per state law, ensuring that the city can recoup some revenue loss while still supporting residents in meeting their tax obligations.

Summary

House Bill 06609 addresses the issue of timely filing for grand list exemptions in the city of Danbury. The bill allows individuals who have failed to file the required statements for the 2019 and 2020 grand list exemption to be considered as having filed on time if they do so within thirty days of the bill's passage. This provision aims to provide relief to eligible property owners who might otherwise miss out on potential tax exemptions due to technicalities in filing.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill has been supportive, particularly among local constituents who stand to benefit from the extended filing period. Property owners who may have faced difficulties in meeting the previous deadlines view the bill favorably as it aids in maintaining their eligibility for tax exemptions. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implications of late filings on the city's revenue and the administrative burden it creates for tax assessors.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 06609 revolve around the balance between providing tax relief to residents and ensuring the financial integrity of city revenue. Critics worry that consistently allowing late filings may set a precedent that could lead to further complications in tax assessments and processing. Supporters argue that this flexibility is necessary to accommodate residents who may face genuine hardships, underscoring the need for a compassionate approach to taxation in the community.