Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06665

Introduced
3/23/21  
Introduced
3/23/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Refer
4/16/21  
Report Pass
4/22/21  
Engrossed
5/11/21  
Report Pass
5/13/21  
Passed
6/8/21  
Chaptered
6/25/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  
Passed
7/12/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Restrictions On Ownership Or Occupancy Of Real Property Based On Race And Elimination Of The Race Designation On Marriage Licenses.

Impact

Upon enactment, this bill significantly impacts state laws regarding real estate. It repeals provisions that allowed racially restrictive covenants to remain valid. All local clerks will be required to notate property records to reflect the invalidity of these covenants, essentially cleaning the property records of historical racial discrimination. This change aligns property law with contemporary values of equality and civil rights, thus bolstering the principle that property ownership should not be hindered by race.

Summary

House Bill 6665, also known as An Act Concerning The Removal Of Restrictions On Ownership Or Occupancy Of Real Property Based On Race And Elimination Of The Race Designation On Marriage Licenses, seeks to eliminate racially discriminatory clauses within property documents. By declaring such unlawful restrictive covenants void, the bill aims to enhance property ownership accessibility for racially marginalized groups. Consequently, any property records that previously contained these provisions will have an affirmative path toward rectification, fostering inclusivity in real estate ownership.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6665 has been largely positive, with widespread support among legislators who advocate for racial equity and show commitment to correcting past injustices in property ownership laws. However, the bill may evoke some contention, particularly among groups feeling that existing property rights might be undermined or affected historically. Nonetheless, the overarching view remains that this measure is a progressive step toward fairness and equality in property laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from potential conflicts with existing property rights and the process required to correct property titles affected by these now-invalid clauses. Despite the strong support for this bill, critics may express concerns over how swiftly changes can be implemented in practice, especially regarding the identification and removal of restrictive covenants from existing deeds. Moreover, detailing the responsibilities of town clerks and owners in recording these changes is essential to ensure smooth execution of the bill's provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA HB1721

Condemnation of conservation or open-space easement; compensation, Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

TX HB2594

Relating to the modification or termination of restrictions by petition in certain real estate developments with certain amenities.

VA HB1912

Wills, trusts, and fiduciaries; Consumer Price Index adjustments, modification of uneconomic trust.

KY HB83

AN ACT relating to interests in property.

KY SB135

AN ACT relating to county clerks.

KY HB377

AN ACT relating to county clerks and making an appropriation therefor.

NV SB368

Revises provisions relating to real property. (BDR 10-989)

MI HB4938

Property: conveyance of state property; transfer of certain state-owned property in Kent County; provide for. Creates land transfer act.