Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00010

Introduced
1/13/21  
Report Pass
1/13/21  
Engrossed
1/14/21  
Engrossed
1/14/21  
Report Pass
1/15/21  
Report Pass
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  
Enrolled
5/12/21  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable A. William Mottolese Of Stamford To Be A State Referee.

Impact

The approval of HJ00010 has implications on the judiciary landscape within the state, as it confirms a key appointment that is pivotal for the functioning of the court system. By confirming a State Referee, the legislature bolsters the judiciary's capacity to manage cases effectively, as State Referees play crucial roles in overseeing court processes and resolving disputes. The resolution passed with strong support, evidenced by a unanimous vote of 143 yeas and no nays, indicating broad bipartisan agreement on the qualifications of the nominee and the importance of maintaining a functional judiciary.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 10 (HJ00010) serves to confirm the nomination of the Honorable A. William Mottolese of Stamford to the position of State Referee. This resolution was introduced by Representative Stafstrom and Senator Winfield, reflecting the legislative process for confirming appointments made by the Governor. The resolution is a straightforward endorsement of the nominee's capabilities and qualifications to serve in this judicial role. The appointment will take effect for a term of eight years, beginning on February 8, 2021. The document highlights the legislative body's responsibility to validate gubernatorial nominations, thus ensuring a system of checks and balances.

Contention

Although the resolution passed smoothly, it may exemplify underlying tensions or discussions surrounding judicial nominations, particularly regarding qualifications, impartiality, and the role of appointed officials. While the swift passage of HJ00010 indicates a consensus on Mottolese's abilities, discussions in various contexts might spotlight differing perspectives on the appointment powers of the Governor and the legislature's role in confirmations, hinting at the complexities involved in maintaining judicial integrity and public confidence. The process, while seemingly procedural, reflects larger dialogues within the state regarding governance and judicial authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.