Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00015

Introduced
1/13/21  
Introduced
1/13/21  
Report Pass
1/13/21  
Engrossed
1/14/21  
Engrossed
1/14/21  
Report Pass
1/15/21  
Report Pass
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  
Passed
1/15/21  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Robert T. Resha Of Danbury To Be A State Referee.

Impact

The passage of HJ00015 would contribute to the continuity and stability within the state's judicial landscape. By confirming Resha’s nomination, the resolution aims to ensure that experienced personnel are in position to handle judicial matters effectively. Furthermore, the role of a State Referee is vital, as they may adjudicate minor disputes and assist in the management of more significant cases, enhancing judicial efficiency.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 15, introduced in January 2021, is a resolution confirming the nomination of Robert T. Resha of Danbury to serve as a State Referee. This resolution is critical as it serves to formalize the appointment of State Referees who play significant roles in the judiciary system of the state. The bill indicates the affirmation of Resha's nomination for a term of eight years, commencing from January 28, 2021. Such appointments are essential for maintaining the effective functioning of the court system, as State Referees handle various judicial assignments and support the overall judicial process.

Contention

There may be minimal points of contention regarding HJ00015, primarily revolving around the political implications of nominations by the Governor. Notably, such nominations can occasionally become contentious during political discourse, particularly if there are concerns about the nominee's qualifications or judicial philosophy. However, the unanimous vote (143 yeas and 0 nays) during the roll call indicates broad support for Resha’s nomination within the legislature, mitigating potential controversies.

Voting_history

HJ00015 was voted on January 14, 2021, achieving a strong endorsement from legislators, which reflects a consensus on the necessity of appointing competent individuals to the judiciary. This unanimous support could signal confidence in both the nominee and the nomination process, reinforcing the importance of judicial appointments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.