Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00358

Introduced
3/19/21  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Michael James.

Impact

The passage of HJ00358 solidifies the Claims Commissioner's authority in determining the validity and legitimacy of claims made against the state. By confirming the dismissal of Michael James's claim, the bill demonstrates a legislative endorsement of the commissioner's discretion to evaluate claims. This, in turn, may deter similar future claims against the state, particularly those that do not meet the legal thresholds set forth by state laws, potentially minimizing financial burdens on taxpayers.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 358 (HJ00358) serves to confirm the decision of the Claims Commissioner in dismissing a financial claim against the state, amounting to more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars, made by Michael James. This resolution reflects the legislative approval of the Claims Commissioner's decision, reinforcing the dismissal's legal standing and defining the state's liability concerning the said claim. The resolution proceeds from the judiciary committee's deliberations, implying the thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding the claim prior to reaching this legislative conclusion.

Conclusion

Ultimately, HJ00358 aims to finalize the state's stance regarding liabilities tied to the claim presented by Michael James. By endorsing the Claims Commissioner's decision, the bill contributes to the broader discourse on state accountability and the mechanisms in place for citizens to seek redress against governmental actions.

Contention

Potential points of contention surrounding HJ00358 could arise from the nature of legal claims against the state and the perceived transparency of the Claims Commissioner's processes. Opponents of the resolution might argue that dismissing significant claims without adequate public discourse undermines the accountability and responsiveness of state operations. Furthermore, concerns may be raised regarding the processes that led to the initial claim being dismissed and whether the claimant received fair consideration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HJ00176

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00194

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Daniel Topar.

CT HJ00193

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Amy French.

CT HJ00196

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Clarence Austin.

CT SJ00165

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Allison Murray.

CT SJ00185

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Darrell Tinsley.

CT HJ00195

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Jamie Gomez.

CT HJ00212

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Justin Hazel.

CT HJ00179

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Jake Ratches.

CT HJ00211

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Earl Bradley.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.